LAXMI NARAYAN AGARWALA and ANR, v. BRIJ KISHORE GUPTA and ORS,
Intest.Cas./1/2011 · 2025-04-28
Devashis Baruah
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5442 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5442 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010003302011
2025:GAU-AS:5184
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Intest.Cas./1/2011 LAXMI NARAYAN AGARWALA and ANR, S/O LATE MANOHAR LAL NOONGAR, R/O NOVA SHARMAS HOUSE NEAR SLUICE GATE BHARALUMUKH, GUWAHATI, DIST. KAMRUP, ASSAM.
2: SURESH KR. GOYAL S/O LATE MANOHAR LAL NOONGAR R/O 111/4 SITE NO. 1 KADIWAL NAGAR KANPUR UTTAR PRADES VERSUS BRIJ KISHORE GUPTA and ORS, S/O LATE MANOHAR LAL NOONGAR, R/O M.S. ROAD, FANCYBAZAR, GUWAHATI, DIST. KAMRUP, ASSAM.
2:ON THE DEATH OF BIMALA DEVI AGARWALA HER LEGAL HEIRS 2.1) SRI PRAVEEN JINDAL S/O LATE PHULCHAND AGARWAL C/O DR. KRISHANT JINDAL NEAR MURARI CINEMA HALL JANDWALI GALI (BHIWANI) PIN 121003 HARYANA 2.2:SRI LALIT JINDAL S/O LATE PHULCHAND AGARWAL R/O DRUM DUKAN LAL BANGLOW ROAD NEAR MASJID TINSUKIA-786125 ASSAM
Page No.# 2/3 2.3:SMT. KUSUM JAIN W/O SRI SURESH JAIN R/O FLAT NO. 10 LEHNA SINGH MARKET NEAR MALKA GANJ CHOWK DELHI-110007 2.4:SRI MOHAN JINDAL SON OF LATE PRADEEP JINDAL RESIDENT OF MAKUM ROAD HUKANPUKHURI TE37/73 NLR. GT. TINSUKIA ASSAM-786146 2.5:RAVI KANT JINDAL SON OF LATE PRADEEP JINDAL RESIDENT OF MAKUM ROAD HUKANPUKHURI TE37/73 NLR. GT. TINSUKIA ASSAM-786146 3:NAVEEN GOYAL SON LEGAL HEIRS OF LATE RAM KISHORE GOYAL 4:JITESH GOYAL SON
5:PANKAJ GOYALSON
6:RAVI GOYAL SON
7:RAJANI GOYALDAUGHTER ALL C/O GANAPATI JEWELERS SURAJ MARKET H.B. ROAD FANCY BAZAR GUWAHATI 8:SUMAN DEVI GUPTA W/O SRI BHAGWAN GUPTA C/O SHRI BHAGWAN GUPTA HOUSE NO. 616 GALI CHHABILIYAN NAJJAFGARH NEW DELHI-4
Page No.# 3/3 For the Appellant(s) : None appears
For the Respondent(s) : Mr. D. Mozumder, Sr. Advocate Mr. S. Biswas, Advocate
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH ORDER Date : 29.04.2025
None appears on behalf of the appellants on call.
2. Mr. D. Mozumder, the learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. S. Biswas, the learned counsel appears on behalf of the respondents.
3. It is seen that on earlier occasion also i.e. on 13.03.2025 none had appeared on behalf of the appellants.
4. Considering the above, it appears that the appellants have lost interest in the instant proceedings, for which, the instant appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
5. The Registry shall return the LCR after 90 (Ninety) days from the date of the instant order.
6. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant