Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5442 (CHH)

HARI RAM DHRUW v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/1022/2025 · 2025-04-16

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:17429 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1022 of 2025 1. Hari Ram Dhruw S/o Late Shri D.R. Dhruw Aged About 61 Years R/o MIG-61, Near New Janta Market, Padmnabhpur, Durg, District Durg (C.G.). ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Public Works Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Engineer-in-Chief, Public Works Department, Nirman Bhavan, Sector 19, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3. Shri B.K. Patoria, Superintending Engineer, PWD Circle Durg, District Durg (C.G.). ... Respondents Cause title is taken from the Case Information System For Petitioner : Ms Shristi Upadhyay, Advocate For Respondent/State : Shri Akhilesh Kumar, Govt. Advocate Order on Board By Bibhu Datta Guru, J. 16/4/2025 1. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the State, on instructions, would submit that albeit the petitioner is questioning the order 10-1-2025 by which the representation of the petitioner has been rejected and the order dated 30-11-2024 whereby the petitioner has been 2 transferred from Durg Circle to the office of the Engineer-in-Chief, Public Works Department, Raipur, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, the petitioner has already joined at the transferred place of posting on 14-1-2025 and, as such, nothing remains in this petition for adjudication. 2. At this juncture, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has joined at the transferred place under pressure, as he is going to retire from service in the month of May, 2025 on attaining the age of superannuation. 3. I have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and perused the documents. 4. Earlier the petitioner has preferred WPS No.7961 of 2024 which was disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to make a fresh representation before the authorities. Thereagainst WA No.903 of 2024 preferred by the petitioner, which was dismissed by the Division Bench of this Court. Even the representation preferred by the petitioner has also been rejected by order dated 10-1-2025. Subsequently, in compliance of the transfer order dated 30-11-2024, according to the learned counsel for the State, the petitioner joined at the transferred place of posting on 14-1-2025. 5. In view of foregoing, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication and accordingly it is dismissed. Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) Judge Gowri K GOWRI SANKARA RAO Digitally signed by K GOWRI SANKARA RAO Date: 2025.04.16 17:51:27 +0530