- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47297 WP No. 34244 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 34244 OF 2025 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SHRI K.Y.VENKATESH, S/O LATE DR. K.R.Y.IYENGAR, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, NO.54, 11TH MAIN, 16TH CROSS, MALLESHWARAM WEST, BENGALURU – 560 055. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. UNION OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF YOUTH AFFAIRS AND SPORTS, SHASTRI BHAWAN, NEW DELHI – 110 001, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. SELECTION COMMITTEE FOR “ARJUNA AWARD”, MINISTRY OF YOUTH AFFAIRS AND SPORTS, SHASTRI BHAWAN, NEW DELHI – 110 001, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47297 WP No. 34244 of 2025 3. MINISTRY OF SOCIAL JUSTILCE AND EMPOWERMENT, ROOM NO.637, A-WING, SHASTRI BHAWAN, NEW DELHI – 110 001, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. ARVIND KAMATH, ASGI FOR SMT. SINCHANA M. R., ADVOCATE) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS TO THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE APPLICATION OF THE PETITIONER AT ANNEXURE-E DTD. 03.10.2025 IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER 1. Petitioner is before this court seeking for the following reliefs: “A. Issue a writ of Mandamus to the respondents to consider the application of the petitioner at Annexure-E dtd. 03.10.2025 in accordance with law. B. Pass such other orders as this Hon’ble Court deems fit in the facts and circumstances of the above case.” 2. The petitioner claims to be a para-athlete who retired from active sports in the year 2012 and thereafter has - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47297 WP No. 34244 of 2025 been involved in various socio-cultural, educational and sporting initiatives. The petitioner has won several medals in various events that he has participated in. 3. The petitioner is now before this Court contending that his application for awardal of the Arjuna Award (life time) had been rejected and the present application has not been considered. 4. In that background, the petitioner is before this Court seeking for a mandamus to direct the respondents to consider the application of the petitioner dated 03.10.2025 at Annexure-E. 5. A perusal of the pleadings filed indicates that the petitioner is a meritorious person, who has won several medals in various events that he has participated in. Be that as it may, the conferment of Arjuna Award is the discretion of the concerned authorities. There is no mala fides which have been urged by the petitioner in the present matter as regards both the non-conferring of the - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47297 WP No. 34244 of 2025 award on the petitioner and/or conferring of the said award on any other person. That being so, there cannot be a vested right in the petitioner, which can give rise to a mandamus being issued to the respondents to consider the said application. 6. As aforesaid, the conferment or otherwise of the Arjuna Award is purely discretionary and unless the same is tainted with any mala fides, the petitioner cannot seek for any reliefs in respect thereto. 7. In that view of the matter, the petition stands dismissed. 8. Needless to say, the dismissal of the present Writ Petition will not come in the way of the respondents considering the candidature of the petitioner for any title or award. SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE CBC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 19/CT:SS