APHC010651892025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THURSDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 33674/2025 Between: T Chengamma The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. GURAVAIAH T Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. POTHAM VENGALA REDDY SC For M.Corporation in Rayalaseema region In 2. GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP The Court made the following: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 33674/2025 AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: Counsel for the Respondent(S): POTHAM VENGALA REDDY SC For M.Corporation in Rayalaseema MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP The Court made the following: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3457] THURSDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N ...PETITIONER ...RESPONDENT(S) POTHAM VENGALA REDDY SC For M.Corporation in Rayalaseema THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No.33674 OF 2025 ORDER: 1. The petitioner is aggrieved by the proposed action of the respondents in trying to take over the petitioner’s land for widening of the roads. 2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the respondents are required to initiate and complete acquisition proceedings in accordance with law before taking possession of the petitioner’s property. However, instead of following the prescribed procedure, the respondents have been sending their men and holding out threats of eviction to the petitioner from the property. 3. The learned standing counsel for the respondent Nos.3 and 4, on oral instructions, submits that there is no interference from the respondents with the petitioner’s property and further submits that, in the event the petitioner’s property is required for any public purpose, including road widening, the respondents shall strictly follow the due process of law. 4. Recording the submission of the learned standing counsel the writ petition is closed. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N KGM 315 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No.33674 OF 2025 Dated 04.12.2025 KGM