APHC010501692024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] SATURDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 26004/2024 Between: 1. KOLLA VENKATA SIVA REDDY, S/O LATE KOLLA VENKATRAMANA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O AVULAVARI PALLI, ANGALLU POST, KURABALAKOTA MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT 2. KOLLA RAMESH REDDY, S/O LATE KOLLA VENKATRAMANA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O AVULAVARI PALLI, ANGALLU POST, KURABALAKOTA MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT 3. KOLLA JAYA NARAYANA REDDY, S/O LATE KOLLA VENKATRAMANA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS. OCC CULTIVATION, R/O AVULAVARI PALLI, ANGALLU POST, KURABALAKOTA MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP BY ITS PRINCIPLE SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT - 522503. 2. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MADANAPALLI, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. 3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MUDIVEDU, KURABALAKOTA MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT 4. YERRACHENU NAGENDRA REDDY, S/O LATE YERRACHENU GANGI REDDY, AGED 45 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O AVULAVARI PALLI, ANGALLU POST, KURABALAKOTA MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. 5. YERRACHENU NAGESWARA REDDY, S/O LATE YERRACHENU GANGI REDDY, AGE 42 YEARS. CULTIVATION AVULAVARI PALLI ANGALLU POST, KURABALAKOTA MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. 6. YERRACHENU NARAYANAMMA, W/O LATE YERRACHENU GANGI REDDY, AGE 67 YEARS. CULTIVATION AVULAVARI PALLI, ANGALLU POST, KURABALAKOTA MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. M VENKATA RAMANA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: 2 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents not to interfering with the petitioners peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit scheduled property as covered by the judgment and decree dated 01.12.2004 in O.S No. 19 of 1997 before the court of the Senior Civil Judge, Madanapalli, Annamayya District as confirmed by S.A No.820 of 2008 dated 18-10-2008 as illegal arbitrary unjust unconstitutional and violative of Article 14, 21, and 300A of the constitution of India as well violative of Human Right and consequently direct the Respondent Nos. 2 to 6 not to interfere with the petitioners peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit schedule property in O.S.No.19 of 1997 before the court of the Senior Civil Judge, Madanapalli, Annamayya District.” 2. Sri M.Venkata Ramana Reddy, learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that the Police are interfering in the civil disputes, though the Petitioners got injunction in their favour. 3. Sri P.Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that, based on the complaint given by Respondent No.5, the Petitioners were called to the Police Station for enquiry, but no crime has been registered against the Petitioners and the Police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the parties. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, Police are directed not to interfere with the civil disputes between the parties, except under due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:20.12.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.26004 of 2024 Dt.20.12.2025 Dinesh