NAGULAPALLI RMALAKSHMI v. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER
WP/15654/2024 · 2025-11-21
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 54396 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 54396 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010309272024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] SATURDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 15654/2024 Between:
1. NAGULAPALLI RMALAKSHMI, W/O RAMANJANEYULU AGED ABOUT 26YRS, OCC HOUSEWIFE R/O KATRENIPADU VILLAGE, MUSUNURU MANDAL ELURU DISTRICT
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, MUSUNURU POLICE STATION ELURU DISTRICT
2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ELURU, ELURU DISTRICT
3. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI GUNTUR DISTRICT
4. PALLAPOTHULA SATYANARAYANA, S/O NAGABHUSHANAM AGED ABOUT 26YRS R/O KATRENIPADU VILLAGE, MUSUNURU MANDAL ELURU DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondent No.1 in not registering the FIR based on the statement, dt.11-06-2024 made by the petitioner in Government hospital, Nuzvidu which was recorded by the Nuzvidu police and forwarded the same to the 1st respondent police station even in spite of the contents of the complaint clearly disclose the commission of the cognizable offences as arbitrary, illegal, contrary to Sec. 154 of Cr.P.C and violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent Nos.1 and 2 to register the FIR against the respondent No.4 based on the statement, dt.11-06-2024 made by the petitioner which was recorded by the Nuzvidu police and forward the same to the 1st respondent police station in terms of Sec. 154 of Cr.P.C. and proceed with the investigation in accordance with Law in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. P NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
2
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been filed, by the Petitioner for the following relief:
“ ... to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondent No.1 in not registering the FIR based on the statement, dt.11-06-2024 made by the petitioner in Government hospital, Nuzvidu which was recorded by the Nuzvidu police and forwarded the same to the 1st respondent police station even in spite of the contents of the complaint clearly disclose the commission of the cognizable offences as arbitrary, illegal, contrary to Sec. 154 of Cr.P.C and violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents 1 and 2 to register the FIR against the respondent No.4 based on the statement, dt.11-06-2024 made by the petitioner which was recorded by the Nuzvidu police and forward the same to the 1st respondent police station in terms of Sec. 154 of Cr.P.C. and proceed with the investigation in accordance with Law in the interest of justice ...”
Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home representing for respondent State. Perused the material on record.
Learned Assistant Government Pleader placed on record the written instructions and would submit that Petitioner filed two complaints against respondent No.4 which were registered as crimes and after completion of investigation charge sheets were filed before the respective trial Courts. Further, on receipt of hospital intimation from Area Hospital, Nuzivedu, he went to the Hospital, recorded the statement of the Petitioner and registered a case in Crime No.142 of 2024 and the case is under investigation and requested to dispose of the Writ Petition by passing appropriate orders.
Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that recording the said submission, this Writ Petition may be disposed of.
3
In that view, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Respondent Police are
directed to follow due process of law with regard to the subject matter. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.
DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/*
4
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Writ Petition No. 15654 of 2024
22.11.2025
Mjl /*