xxxxxx [2025:JHHC:19243] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 1201 of 2025 Rajendra Das @ Rajendra Kumar Das, aged about 20 years, S/O -Jotish Das @ Jyotish Das R/O Village-Basmandih, P.O- Gurukul, P.S. -Kunda, District - Deoghar. … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opp. party Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY For the Petitioner : Mr. Rahul Ranjan , Adv. For the State : Mr. Shailendra Kr. Tiwari, Spl. PP. 03 / 15.07.2025 I.A. no. 8526 of 2025 Heard the parties. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that this interlocutory application has been filed with a prayer for early hearing of this Bail Application. Since, this Bail Application is taken up today, hence, this interlocutory application is disposed of being infructuous. (ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.) B.A. No. 1201 of 2025 The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No. 123 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 66B, 66C, 66D, 84C of I.T. Act.. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has defrauded the victims namely Putul Saini to the tune of Rs. 3599/- and Rakesh Yogi to the tune of Rs. 8500/-. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false and one mobile phone with one SIM card was recovered from the possession of the petitioner. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, as mentioned in paragraph 22 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in jail custody since 12.11.2024 , as mentioned in para 22 of this bail application. It is next submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the trial of the case and undertakes to transfer Rs. 3,599/- to the bank account of Putul Saini and Rs. 8,500/- to the bank account of Rakesh Yogi without prejudice to his defence in this case hence, the petitioner may be admitted to regular bail. Learned Spl. P.P. opposed the prayer for regular bail . Considering submissions of learned counsels and the facts as stated above, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Hence, the court below is directed to release the petitioner on bail showing the proof that the petitioner has transferred Rs. 3,599/- to the bank account of Putul Saini and Rs. 8,500/- to the bank account of Rakesh Yogi without prejudice to his defence in this case on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge II-cum- Special Judge, Cyber Crime Case, Deoghar in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No. 123 of 2024 with the condition that the petitioner will co- operate with the trial of the case and will furnish mobile phone number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change the mobile phone number during the trial of the case. (ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.) Smita/-