Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 54377 (KAR)

SMT.MEENAKSHI v. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE

WPHC/73/2025 · 2025-09-09

Anu Sivaraman, Rajesh Rai K

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35419-DB WPHC No. 73 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K WRIT PETITION HABEAS CORPUS NO. 73 OF 2025 BETWEEN: SMT.MEENAKSHI W/O ARUN KUMAR AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, NANDAGUDI VILLAGE HOSKOTE TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL TALUK - 562 122. PRESENTLY RESIDING AT C/O NARAYAN, NO.234 A , 5TH CROSS, MARAMMA TEMPLE ROAD, UTTARAHALLI, SUBRAMANYAPURA, BANGALORE – 560 061. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. JAIRAJ G., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE NO.5, MILLERS ROAD, VASANTH NAGAR, BANGALORE – 560 052. Digitally signed by CHANDANA B M Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35419-DB WPHC No. 73 of 2025 2. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER NANDAGUDI POLICE STATION, STATE HIGH WAY 82, HOSKOTE - CHINTAMANI ROAD, HOSKOTE BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT – 562 122. 3. SRI ARUN KUMAR S S/O SRINIVASA N AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, RESIDING AT NANDAGUDI, HOSKOTE BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT – 562 122. ALSO AT PERJENAHALLI , VEMGAL KOLAR DISTRICT 563 128. 4. STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF HOME AFFAIRS VIDHANASOUDHA BENGALURU-560 001 REP. BY ITS SECRETARY. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B.A. BELLIYAPPA, SPP-1 A/W SRI. THEJESH P., HCGP) WP(HC) IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE WRIT OF HABEUS CORPUS, DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO PRODUCE THE MINOR CHILD EASHANE BEFORE THIS HONBLE COURT AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35419-DB WPHC No. 73 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not intend to pursue the Writ Petition Habeas Corpus as the parties are working out their remedies before the Family Court. A memo for withdrawal of the Writ Petition is also placed on record. 2. Accepting the memo, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE Sd/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE BMC List No.: 2 Sl No.: 1