Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 54366 (AP)

BANDARU SWAMIDAS v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/32089/2023 · 2025-11-23

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010622912023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 32089/2023 Between: 1. BANDARU SWAMIDAS, S/O. LATE NARASAIAH, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,THURUPUYARRABALLI VILLAGE, KONDAPURAMMANDAL SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KAVALI TOWN, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KONDAPURAM POLICE STATION, KONDAPURAM MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. DR G V RAVI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the inaction of the 4th respondent with regard to the complaint dated 21-10-2023 as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article 19, 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India and against the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the 4th respondent to dispose of the complaint dated 21-10-2023 and to pass...” 2. Today, when the matter came up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that nothing survives for adjudication in the Writ Petition and the matter has become infructuous. 3. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. __________________________________ Dr.VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J Date: 24.11.2025 ASR 146 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.32089 of 2023 Dt.24.11.2025 ASR