Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:51914
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 12196 of 2025
1. Johan Singh S/o Shri Shyam Sundar Shori Aged About 62 Years R/o Village And Post Belarbahra, Tashil Nagri District - Dhamtari (C.G.)
2. Chinta Ram Yadav S/o Rameshwar Yadav Aged About 77 Years R/o Village And Post Tekapar District- Durg (C.G.)
3. Durpati Sendre W/o Gothi Ram Aged About 60 Years R/o Village And Post Rudri Tahsil And District- Dhamtari (C.G.)
4. Dulesh Bai W/o Ramkumar Rawat Aged About 62 Years R/o Village And Post Achhota Tahsil And District- Dhamtari (C.G.)
5. Khorbahrin Bai W/o Kanhaiya Lal Sahu Aged About 77 Years R/o Village And Post Gangrel Tahsil And District- Dhamtari (C.G.)
6. Gambhir Prasad Patel S/o Gosai Ram Patel Aged About 70 Years R/o Village And Post Gangrel Tahsil And District- Dhamtari (C.G.)
7. Thakur Ram Verma S/o Ramadhin Verma Aged About 64 Years R/o Village And Post Ganiyari Tahsil And District- Raipur Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner(s) versus
1. State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Water Resources Department Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur District- Raipur (C.G.)
2. Engineer In Chief Water Resources Department Shivnath Bhawan Atal Nagar Raipur (C.G.
3. Chief Engineer Mahanadi Reservoir Project Water Resources Department Atal Nagar Raipur (C.G.)
4. Executive Engineer (Water Resources Department ) E/m H.E.M.M. Division Rudri District - Dhamtari (C.G.)
2
5. - Executive Engineer (Water Management Division) Code No. 38, Rudri District- Dhamtari (C.G.)
... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Amod Kumar Shrivastava, Advocate. For Respondent(s) /State. : Mr. Aditya Tiwari, Panel Lawyer
(Hon’ble Mr. Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas)
Order on Board 17/10/2025
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the issue involved in this writ petition has already been decided by this Court in case of Faguvaram Patel & others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh [WPS No. 3870 of 2021 (decided on 30.09.2022)], therefore, the present writ petition may be disposed of in the same terms.
2. In view of the above, the instant writ petition also deserves to be
disposed of in terms of the judgment passed by this Court in case of Faguvaram Patel (supra).
3. Accordingly, the writ petition (s) stands disposed of. Sd/-
(Narendra Kumar Vyas)
JUDGE Raju
RAVVA SATYANARAYANA RAJU Digitally signed by RAVVA SATYANARAYANA RAJU Date: 2025.10.27 11:17:14 +0530