Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:4925] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Second Bail Application No. 1550/2025 Ravi Rai S/o Shri Gopendra, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Brahampuri Colony, Hindaun City, Thana Nai Mandi, Hindaun City, District Karauli (Presently Lodged At Sub District Jail, Bayana, Bharatpur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sudhir Jain For Complainant(s) For State : : Mr. Utkarsh Goyal on behalf of Mr. Rajneesh Gupta Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Order 04/02/2025
1. The accused-petitioner has filed this second bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. arising out of F.I.R. No.252/2024 registered with the Police Station Bayana, District Bharatpur for offence under Section 392 IPC.
2. Heard.
3. Considered the submissions made at bar and also perused the material available on record.
4. The first bail application bearing No.9603/2024 (Ravi Rai Vs. State of Raj.) filed by the petitioner was dismissed by this Court vide order dated 17.09.2024, looking to the fact that the complainant was not examined by the learned trial Court by that
[2025:RJ-JP:4925] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-1550/2025] time and the Court was of the view that the complainant be examined without there being any fear or influence by the accused party, who were in custody at that time.
5. The complainant has now been examined before the learned trial Court. Out of total twenty four (24) witnesses, only four (4) witnesses have been examined so far and the accused-petitioner is in custody since 14.07.2024.
6. Taking into consideration the over all facts and circumstances of the case, further, the nature of allegations levelled against the present petitioner, more particularly the fact that the accused- petitioner is in custody since 14.07.2024 and till date only four (4) witnesses have been examined out of twenty four (24) witnesses, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.
7. This second bail application is, accordingly, allowed and it is
directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court or any other Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /21