APHC011155502002 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 19966/2002 Between: 1. B .ANNAPURANA,, D/O LATE B .RAMA RAO, AGED 20 YEARS, R/O I.J.NAIDU COLONY, AMADALAVALASA POST, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE A P S R T C, REP BY ITS VICE-CHAIRMAN CUM MANAGING DIRECTOR, MUSHEERABAD, HYDERABAD. 2. THE A P S R T C, REP BY ITS REGIONAL MANAGER, SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the proceedings No.P1/225(23)/98 RM_SKLM dated.9-11-2011 of the 2nd respondent is illegal, arbitrary, unjustified, unsustainable, discriminatory and unconstitutional and set a side the same consequently direct for appointment to the post of conduction or any other suitable post on compassionate grounds under the bread winners scheme and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2002 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to 2 direct the respondents to consider the petitioner for appointment to the post of conductor or any other suitable post on compassionated ground under the bread winner scheme forth with pending disposal of writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. ARAVALA RAMA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. VINOD KUMAR TARLADA (SC FOR APSRTC) 3 The Court made the following order: Though the matter is listed today under the caption ‘For Dismissal’, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. On earlier occasions also i.e., on 18.09.2025 and 01.09.2025, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It shows that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting her case. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous applications are closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 25.09.2025 MP 4 183 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO:19966 of 2002 Date: 25.09.2025 MP