Research › Search › Judgment
Bombay High Court · body
2025 DAILYLAW 54356 (BOM)
SUREKHA TUKARAM DHANDAR, (A/M SUREKHA VILAS JADHAV) v. ZILLA PARISHAD, BULDHANA, THR. ITS THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
WP/5873/2024 · 2025-01-29
Shri Abhay J Mantri, Shri Avinash G Gharote
body2025
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 54356 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 54356 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 56wp5873.2024..odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, AT NAGPUR.
WRIT PETITION NO. 5873 OF 2024 (Surekha Tukaram Dhandar Vs. Zilla Parishad, Buldhana) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. R. Dhore, Advocate for petitioner, CORAM : AVINASH G. GHAROTE & ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ.
DATED : 29-01-2025 The only relief claimed, is a direction to the respondent to take decision on the representation dated 30.5.2024 preferred by the petitioner, in light of the husband wife unification policy as reflected in the Government Resolution dtd 27.2.2017. Mr. Jahagirdar, learned Counsel for respondent is absent. Considering the limited relief sought, we dispose of the petition by directing sole respondent to take appropriate decision upon the representation dated 30.5.2024 preferred by the petitioner in terms of husband wife unification policy, within a period of three weeks from the date of this order.
(ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.) (AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.) Belkhede