Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 54350 (AP)

YELISETTY VIJAYA SARADHI v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/30702/2025 · 2025-11-27

D Ramesh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010589242025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 30702/2025 Between: 1. YELISETTY VIJAYA SARADHI, S/O LATE SITHARAMAIAH, R/O D.NO 3-4-249, GANDHI NAGAR, GANDHI CHOWK, KHAMMAM RURAL, KHAMMAM DISTRICT. TELANGANA STATE, PIN CODE- 507003 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITSPRINICIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT,SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS NELAPADU, AMARAVATI,GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, O/O DISTRICT COLIECTORATE, PRAKASAM BHAVAN, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, O/O MARKAPURAM REVENUE DIVISION, MARKAPURAM, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 4. THE THASILDAR, O/O THASILDAR OFFICE, MARKAPURAM MANDL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 5. THE SUB REGISTER, STAMPS AND REGISTRATION DEPARTMENT, O/O SUB REGISTRAR, MARKAPURAM MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): The Court made the following: 1. The present writ petition is filed aggrieved by the inaction of Respondent No. 3 in not taking any steps to dispose of the appeal preferred by the petitioner on 14.08.2025 against the order of the 4th respondent vide R.C. A/148/2024 dated 16.07.2025, wherein the petitioner seeks mutation of the name of his mother, Smt. Yelisetty Ramamma, being the legal heir of his deceased father. The said appeal remains pending before the 3rd respondent, which is alleged to be illegal and in violation of Section 5(4) of the Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Book Act, 1971. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner preferred the appeal before the RDO/3rd respondent, but the same has neither been considered nor disposed of till date. 3. On perusal of the appeal, it is observed that the appeal was filed on 14.08.2025, that is, merely two months prior to the institution of the writ petition. In view of the above, this Court is not inclined to enter into the merits of the case at this stage. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the 3rd respondent to consider and to dispose of the appeal filed by the petitioner and to pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within a period of four (04) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition shall stand closed. ________________________ JUSTICE D. RAMESH 28.11.2025 klk 414 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION No.30702 of 2025 28.11.2025 kkllkk