1 2025:CGHC:20792 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 662 of 2024 1 - Mrs. Sona Sahu W/o Shri Ram Niwas Sahu Aged About 38 Years Occupation Service, Posted As Assistant Teacher At Government Primary School, Narayanpur, District Surajpur (C.G.) Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Pardeshi Siddharth Komal Secretary School Education Department, E And T, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, Revenue And Civil District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Niharika Barik Singh Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, Revenue And Civil District Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Ram Lalit Patel District Education Officer District Surajpur Chhattisgarh. 4 - Pandit Bhardwaj Lecturer At Present Block Education Officer Ramanujnagar, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh. 5 - Nandni Sahu Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat Surajpur District Surajpur Chhattisgarh. 6 - Sanjay Kumar Rai Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Ramanujnagar, District Surajpur, Chhattisgarh. Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from Case Information System) Petitioner Mrs. Sona Sahu appears in person through VC For Respondent No.1: Mr. Amrito Das, Advocate For Resp. No. 2 : Mr. Animesh Tiwari, Advocate For Resp No. 5 & 6 : Mr. Ravi Bhagat, Advocate RAHUL JHA Digitally signed by RAHUL JHA Date: 2025.05.07 17:30:42 +0530 2 (HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE BIBHU DATTA GURU) Order on Board 06/05/2025 1. This Contempt Petition has been preferred due to non compliance of the order passed by the Division Bench of this Court in W.A. No. 261/2023. 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for respondent No. 1 by placing a communication dated 05/05/2025 submits that an amount of Rs. 8, 59,958/- has been released to the petitioner in compliance of the impugned order. 3. The said fact has not been disputed by the petitioner in person. However, she has raised objection with respect to the quantum of amount and submits that the calculation has been wrongly made. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the notification placed on record. 5. On perusal of the communication dated 05/05/2025, it appears that the order of this Court as well as the order of the Supreme Court have been complied with. If the petitioner is having any grievance towards the quantum of amount, she may take appropriate recourse of law. 6. Accordingly, the Contempt Petition is disposed of. The rule is discharged. Sd/- Sd/- (BIBHU DATTA GURU) JUDGE Rahul