APHC010234262021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 14403/2021 Between: 1. U RAMA KRISHNA, S/O VENKATA SWAMY BANK EMPLOYEE AGED 59 YEARS PLOT NO. 303 PRUDHVI APARTMENTS BD COLONY BAGHAMBARAPET HYDERABAD 2. UNGUTURU RADHIKA, W/O RAMA KRISHNA HOUSE WIFE, AGED 52 YEARS PLOT NO. 303 PRUDHIVI APARTMENTS BD COLONY, BAGH AMBARAPET, HYDERABAD 3. MOKKARALA VAISTANAVI SRIJA, W/O SIVA RAMA KRISHNA HOUSE WIFE AGED 23 YEARS R/O PLAT NO 303, PRUDHVI APARTMENTS BD COLONY, BAGH AMBARAPET, HYDERABAD ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT HOME DEPARTMENT AP SECRETARIAT AMARAVATI 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR DISTRICT 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PIDUGURALLA POLICE STATION GUNTUR 4. MOKARALA SIVA RAMA KRISHNA, S/O SRINIVASA RAO SOFT WARE ENGINEER 25 YEARS, R/O UDUTHA PICHAYYA BAZAR OPP PALAKENDRAM PIDUGURALLA GUNTUR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondents frequently by alternate days calling the petitioners come to the 3rd respondent police station stating that the 4th respondent alleged to made complaint and thereby mentally and physically harassing the petitioners for time to illegal arbitrary and principles of natural justice and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to harass the petitioners to come to the SHO 3rd respondents PS and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. NARAM NAGESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. SRINIVASA RAO NARRA 2. 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent frequently by alternate days calling the petitioners come to the 3rd respondent police station stating that the 4th respondent alleged to made complaint and thereby mentally and physically harassing the petitioners for time to illegal arbitrary and principles of natural justice and pass...” 2. Heard Sri Naram Nageswara Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home and Sri N.Srinivasa Rao, learned counsel for the respondent No.4. 3. This Writ Petition is filed seeking a direction from the police not to call the petitioners by alternative days under the guise of the complaint which is alleged to have made by the respondent No.4 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Homes would submit that this Court may pass appropriate orders. 5. Learned counsel for the respondent No.4 would submit that the dispute between the parties is settled. 6. Recording the said submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 06.10.2025. SNI 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.14403 of 2021 Dated.06.10.2025 SNI 706