Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010083792025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 5307/2025 Between:
1. J RAVI KUMAR, AGE 47 YRS, S/O J.S.R.MURTHY, R/O FLAT NO.201,
KANAKADURGA RESIDENCY, BMPS ROAD, PRASADAMPADU, VIJAYAWADA
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF AP, REP BY ITS PRI.SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETERIATE, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT
2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE POLICE COMMISSIONER, VIJAYAWADA COMMISSIONERATE VIJAYAWADA. 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR, PATAMATA POLICE STATION PATAMATA, VIJAYAWADA
5. THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, PATAMATA POLICE STATION, PATAMATA, VIJAYAWADA
6. THE NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA, VIJAYAWADA
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue order direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declare the action of the respondents in not taking action on the complaint made by the petitioner made on 13/02/2025 against abduction of the petitioner from his home by three persons illegally to Hyderabad in front of the respondents 3 and 4 to saroornagar, Hyderabad and extorting money of Rs.l.00 Lakh from the petitioner's father as illegal, violation of fundamental rights and consequently direct the respondents to take action on the persons who abducted illegally from his house as mentioned in the complaint Dt. 13/02/2025 and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. PARTY IN PERSON Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
2. S S VARMA (SC FOR NHAI)
2
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been filed, by the Petitioner for the following relief:
“ ... to issue order direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declare the action of the respondents in not taking action on the complaint made by the petitioner on 13.02.2025 against abduction of the petitioner from his home by three persons illegally to Hyderabad in front of the respondents 3 and 4 to saroornagar, Hyderabad and extorting money of Rs.l.00 Lakh from the petitioner's father as illegal, violation of fundamental rights and consequently direct the respondents to take action on the persons who abducted illegally from his house as mentioned in the complaint Dt.
13/02/2025 and to pass ...”
Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home representing for respondent State. Perused the material on record. Learned Assistant Government Pleader placed on record written instructions and would submit that in view of involvement of the Petitioner in a cheating case, a case in crime No.974 of 2022 is registered by Saroornagar Police Station, Rangareddy District, who came to Vijayawada and took custody of the Petitioner’s father/Accused (A.1). In that view, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Petitioner is at liberty to work out the remedy before appropriate forum. Police are directed to follow due process of law with regard to the subject matter. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 04.12.2025
3
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Writ Petition No. 5307 of 2025
04.12.2025
Mjl /*