Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 54340 (KAR)

VITTAL RAI v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/6616/2025 · 2025-07-14

Suraj Govindaraj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26002 WP No. 6616 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 6616 OF 2025 (CS-RES) BETWEEN: VITTAL RAI, S/O.KORAGAPPA RAI, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, KALMANE HOUSE, POST VEERAKAMBLA, BANTWAL TALUK, DAKSHINA KANNADA - 574 222. …PETITIONER (BY SMT. KAVITHA N, ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATION SOCIETY, VIDHANA SOUDHA, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 560 001, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE RECOVERY OFFICER, THE RECOVERY OFFICER OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, MANGALORE SUB DIVISION, MANGALORE - 575 003. 3. THE VITLA GRAMEENA SAHAKARI BANK NIYAMITHA, (REGISTERED UNDER CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY ACT), REPRESENTED BY ITS CEO, VITLA, KASABA VILLAGE, BANTWAL TALUK, D.K. - 574 243. Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26002 WP No. 6616 of 2025 4. KARNATAKA VIKASA GRAMEENA BANK, (REGISTERED UNDER CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY ACT) REP BY ITS CEO, VITLA, KASABA VILLAGE, BANTWAL TALUK, D.K. - 574 243. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. YOGESH D. NAIK, AGA FOR R1 AND R2; SRI. G. BALAKRISHNA SHASTRY, ADVOCATE FOR R3; SRI. VIJAY S, ADVOCATE FOR R4) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FORM NO.8 AND 9 AUCTION NOTICES DATED 24/02/2025 ISSUED BY THE RECOVERY OFFICER OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, MANGALORE SUB DVN, MANGALORE IN ARB NO. 73/2019-20, E.P NO 173/2024-25 AT ANNEXURE-A AND B AND ALL OTHER FURTHER PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT THERETO, (IN SO FAR AS PETITIONER CONCERN) AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER 1. None appears for the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter. 2. The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26002 WP No. 6616 of 2025 3. Registry is directed to put up the above order in the event of the petitioner filing any other petition on similar grounds against the respondents. SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE VM List No.: 2 Sl No.: 15 CT: BHK