1 2025:CGHC:20598 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 445 of 2025  Bharosh Das S/o Tejrai Aged About 61 Years R/o Village Chainpur, Tahsil Udaipur, District Surguja Chhattisgarh. ... Applicant(s) versus 1. Koushilya Devi W/o Late Kalyan Das Aged About 65 Years R/o Village Bajbagh Police Station Udaipur, District Surguja (Ambikapur,), Chhattisgarh. 2. Vilash Das S/o Late Kalyan Das Aged About 42 Years R/o Village Bajbagh Police Station Udaipur, District Surguja (Ambikapur,), Chhattisgarh. 3. Dinbandhu S/o Late Kalyan Das Aged About 38 Years R/o Village Bajbagh Police Station Udaipur, District Surguja (Ambikapur,), Chhattisgarh. 4. Sumrit S/o Late Kalyan Das Aged About 48 Years R/o Village Rikhi Police Station And Tahsil Udaipur, District Surguja (Ambikapur,), Chhattisgarh. 5. Satila D/o Late Kalyan Das Aged About 45 Years R/o Haldibadi Chirmiri Police Station And Tahsil Bada Bazar, District Koriya (Baikunthpur), Chhattisgarh. 6. Santosh Kumar Jaiswal S/o Seetaram Jaiswal Aged About 50 Years Occupation - Agriculture, R/o Village Rajbandh Police Station And Tahsil Udaipur, District Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh. 7. Udai Das S/o Late Bodhi Das Occupation - Agriculture, R/o Village Rajbandh Police Station And Tahsil Udaipur, District Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh. 8. Smt. Jagarmati D/o Ramdas Aged About 60 Years R/o Village Chainpur Tahsil Udaipur, District Surguja (Ambikapur) Chhattisgarh. 9. Smt. Dhanpatiya W/o Late Devchand Aged About 55 Years R/o Village Chainpur Tahsil Udaipur, District Suruguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh. 10. Ashok S/o Dharam Aged About 40 Years R/o Village Chainpur, Tahsil Udaipur, District Surguja, (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh. 11. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector Surguja Ambikapur, District Surguja (Ambikapur) Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Digitally signed by SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Date: 2025.05.06 16:17:51 +0530 2 For Applicant : Mr. Anurag Singh, Advocate For State : Mr. Pramod Shrivastava, Dy. Government Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 06. 05.2025 1. Heard an application for restoration of WP227 No. 663 of 2022. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that WP227 No. 663 of 2022 was dismissed for want of prosecution vide Order dated 07.04.2025. He would further submit that name of Advocate was not reflected in the cause list, and therefore, no-one appeared, when the matter was taken up for hearing; therefore, the petition was dismissed. He would pray to restore WP227 No. 663 of 2022. 3. On the other hand, learned counsel appearing for the State would oppose. 4. Taking into consideration the submission made by Mr. Singh and the reasons assigned in the application, the instant MCC for restoration of WP227 No. 663 of 2022 is hereby allowed. The WP227 No. 663 of 2022 is restored to its original number. 5. Accordingly, MCC stands disposed of. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge $iddhant