Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 54331 (AP)

KODIGUDLA SUDHAKAR v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/11678/2024 · 2025-12-19

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010232082024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] SATURDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 11678/2024 Between: 1. KODIGUDLA SUDHAKAR, S/O KODIGUDLA CHENGAPPA. AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/O D.NO.1-43. KRISHNAPURAM. PENCHUPADU POST AND VILLAGE, MADANAPALLI MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. 2. KODIGUDLA RAMACHANDRA,, S/O KODIGUDLA CHENGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O D.NO.1-43. KRISHNAPURAM, PENCHUPADU POST AND VILLAGE, MADANAPALLI MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS. VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MADANAPALLI RURAL POLICE STATION, MADANAPALLI TOWN, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, , MADANAPALLI RURAL POLICE STATION, MADANAPALLI TOWN, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. 4. SAAE SHEKHARA, S/O LATE NAGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O KRISHNAPURAM, PENCHUPADU POST AND VILLAGE, MADANAPALLI MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. 2 ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. M VENKATA RAMANA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 11678/2024 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue a Writ. order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in interfering with my peaceful possession and enjoyment of the land in Sy.No.11/A to an extent Ac.1.55 cents paiki Ac.1.00 cents and Adjacent land situated in Sy No.11/A1 an extent Ac. 1.00 cents of Penchupadu Revenue Village, Madanapalle Mandal, Annamayya District as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and contrary to the Article 14, 19, 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents Police not to interfere with my peaceful possession and enjoyment of the land in Sy.No. 11/A to an extent Ac.1.55 cents paiki Ac.1.00 cents and Adjacent land situated in Sy No.11/A1 an extent Ac.1.00 cents of Penchupadu Revenue Village, Madanapalle Mandal, Annamayya District the civil disputes pending in I.A.no. 97 of 2024 in OS No. 294 of 2024 on the file of Hon'ble Principal Civil Judge (junior Division), Madanapalle, Chittoor District.…” 2. None represented for the petitioners. 3. Sri P.Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on instructions, would submit that the respondent-police never interfered in the property of the petitioner and the police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the petitioners and the unofficial respondent. 4. Recording the same, this Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the respondent-police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties, except under due process of law. No order as to costs. 4 As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 20.12.2025. UPS 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 11678/2024 Dated.20.12.2025 UPS 207