APHC010593712023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] SATURDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 30702/2023 Between: 1. GUNTI SAMBASIVA RAO, , S/O. VENKATESWARA RAO HINDU, MALE, AGED 72 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 11-168, RTC COLONY, BUJJI BUJJI NELLORE, NELLORE RURAL-524004. 2. GUNTI NAGESWARA RAO,, S/O. VENKATESWARA RAO HINDU, MALE, AGED 70 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.11-149, RTC COLONY, BUJJI BUJJI NELLORE, NELLORE RURAL-524004. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPLE SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR DISTRICT, GUNTUR. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER/INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MANGALGIRI POLICE STATION, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. GUNTI RAMAKRISHNA, . , S/O. VENKATESWARA RAO, HINDU, MALE, ABOUT 60 YEARS. JEWELLERY BUSINESS, R/O. D.NO.57-1-35, KARANAM VEEDHI, PATAMATA, VIJAYAWADA CITY. 5. GUNTI PRABHAKAR, S/O. VENKATESWARA RAO HINDU, MALE, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, C/O. KOUTARAPU RADHAKRISHNA R/O. D.NO. 5-500/B74, ANJANEYA COLONY, MANGALAGIRI,GUNTUR DISTRICT. 6. TIRUVEEDULA LAKSHMI SUJATHA, W/O. NAGESWARA RAO, HINDU, FEMALE, AGE 58 YEARS, NEAR VEPA CHETTU CENTER, KIRANA SHOP, YERRABALEM VILLAGE, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 7. KOWTHARAPU MADHAVI PADMA, W/O. RADHA KRISHANA, HINDU, FEMALE, AGE 56 YEARS, D.NO.5-500/B74, ANJEYANA COLONY, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 8. DAMERLA VIJAYA LAKSHMI, W/O. DAMERLA SAMBA SIVA RAO, HINDU, FEMALE, AGE 50 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.400-403, B 2 COLONY, KONDAPALLI, NTR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or a direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamusdeclaring the aggrieved by the action of the Respondent No.3 in not takingany action against the un-official Respondents and not registering the case onpetitioners complaint dt.04.08.2023 to the 3rd Respondent and complaint to his superiors dt.28.07.2023 as illegal, irregular, arbitrary violative of theprovisions of the Criminal Procedure Code and also offends Articles 14, 21 and300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the official Respondents to take action against the un-official Respondents for theirhighhanded acts of criminal trespass and attacks as per law and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. MANGENA SREE RAMA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been filed, by the Petitioners for the following relief: “ ... to issue a writ, order or a direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the aggrieved by the action of the Respondent No.3 in not taking any action against the un-official Respondents and not registering the case on petitioners complaint dt.04.08.2023 to the 3rd Respondent and complaint to his superiors dt.28.07.2023 as illegal, irregular, arbitrary violative of the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code and also offends Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the official Respondents to take action against the un-official Respondents for their highhanded acts of criminal trespass and attacks as per law and pass ...” Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home representing for respondent State. Perused the material on record. Learned Assistant Government Pleader on instructions would submit that there are tenancy disputes between the Petitioners and the unofficial respondents, petitioners sent a complaint through registered post, which is received by the Police, as per the contents, it revealed that the dispute is civil in nature, Police never called the Petitioners to the Police Station to settled the civil disputes, and requested to dispose of the Writ Petition by passing appropriate orders. Learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that recording the said submission, this Writ Petition may be disposed of. 4 In that view, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Petitioners are at liberty to work out the remedy before appropriate Forum according to law. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* Dinesh 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 30702 of 2023 22.11.2025 Mjl /* Dinesh