IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3429 of 2025 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10113 of 2023 ====================================================== 1. Paras Nath Pandey S/o Late Shiwdeni Pandey, Resident of Gosai Tola, Station Road, Manikpur, Ward No.22, P.S.-Gopalganj, District-Gopalganj. 2. Virendra Mishra, S/o Late Raj Kishor Mishra, Resident of Advocate Nagar, Manikpur, Ward no.14, P.S. and District-Gopalganj. 3. Tara Kant Jha, S/o Late Pulkit Jha, Resident of Ward No.22, Near Railway Station, P.S. and District-Gopalganj. 4. Sunil Kumar Ojha, S/o Late Brahmdatta Ojha @ Brahm dutt, R/o North to V.M. Hajiyapur, Ward No. 26, P.S. and District-Gopalganj. 5. Surya Kant Mishra, Resident of Ward No. 22, Station Road, P.S. and District-Gopalganj. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, B. Rajender Education Department Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. Sri Yogendra singh, the Director, Secondary Education, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. Bihar State Sanskrit Shiksha Board through its Secretary, House No.17, Behind harding Road, Patna-01. 4. Sri Mritunjay Kumar Jha, the Chairman, Bihar State Sanskrit Shiksha Board, House No.17, Behind harding Road, Patna-01. 5. Sri Niraj Kumar, the Secretary, Bihar State Sanskrit Shiksha Board, House No.17, Behind Harding Road, Patna-01. 6. Sri Yogesh Kumar, the District Education Officer, Gopalganj. 7. Sri Saheb Alam, the District Programme Officer (Estb.), Gopalganj. 8. Smt. Nirmala Kumari, the Headmaster, Bhudeo Sanskrit High School, Gopalganj. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sushil Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Arvind Kumar, AC to GP-23 Mr. Chandra Shekhar Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR ORAL ORDER 4 03-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Patna High Court MJC No.3429 of 2025(4) dt.03-04-2026 2/2 2. Learned counsel for the State by referring to the statement made in paragraph-6 of the show cause filed on behalf of the opposite party no.7, submits that the petitioners representation filed for grant of provident fund has already been adjudicated. It is further submitted that the amount has been sanctioned and the same has been credited to the tune of Rs.26,22,161/- vide Memo No.888 dated 11.03.2026. 3. In view of the submissions made on behalf of the State and considering that the grievances of the petitioners have been redressed, therefore, nothing survives for adjudication. 4. Accordingly, the present application stands disposed of. shikha/- (Ajit Kumar, J) U