03.01.2025 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Item No.3 CIRCUIT BENCH AT JALPAIGURI Ct.No.2 CRIMINAL REVISIONAL JURISDICTION kausik C.R.R. 515 of 2024 Sushil Kumar Jain Vs. State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Subham Sarkar … For the Petitioner. Mr. Aditi Shankar Chakraborty, APP Mr. Aniruddha Biswas …For the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits, he is yet to receive documents under section 207 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. However, records reflect that an application under section 227 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, praying for discharge, was filed by the petitioner before the learned Sessions Judge, which the learned Sessions Judge after consideration of the materials on record was pleased to dismiss the same. The enclosures to the revisional application do not reflect that any statement of any witness has been made available to this court for reappreciation of the finding of the learned Trial Court. Mr. Chakraborty, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appears on behalf of the state. A copy of the revisional application be made available to him. 2 In view of the paucity of materials enclosed along with the present revisional application, there is no scope for reappreciation of the finding of the learned trial court. Accordingly, the revisional application being CRR 515 of 2024 is dismissed. All concerned parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)