Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 54309 (KAR)

MR LINGARAJU BASAPPA BANAKAR v. THE UNION OF INDIA

WP/24185/2022 · 2025-09-22

R Nataraj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:37886 WP No. 24185 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 24185 OF 2022 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: MR. LINGARAJU BASAPPA BANAKAR AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS SON OF MR. BASAPPA TIRUKAPPA BANAKAR RESIDING AT NO.176 ASHIRWAD, 9TH MAIN, 2ND CROSS BCC LAYOUT, 2ND STAGE CHANDRA LAYOUT BANGALORE-560 040. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SRINIVAS V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE NORTH BLOCK NEW DELHI-110 001. 2. THE MINISTRY OF FINANCE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY NORTH BLOCK NEW DELHI-110 001. 3. RESERVE BANK OF INDIA ESTABLISHED UNDER THE RESERVE BANK OF INDIA ACT HAVING ONE OF ITS OFFICE AT NRUPATHUNGA ROAD BENGALURU-560 001. REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER. Digitally signed by SUMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:37886 WP No. 24185 of 2022 4. NATIONAL HOUSING BANK CORE 5-A, INDIA HABITAT CENTRE LODHI ROAD, NEW DELHI-110 003 REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED OFFICER/MANAGER REGD UNDER NATIONAL HOUSING BANK 1987 5. TRANSUNION CIBIL LIMITED (FORMERLY: CREDIT INFORMATION BUREAU (INDIA) LIMITED) ONE INDIABULLS CENTRE TOWER 2A, 19TH FLOOR SENAPTIBAPATMARG ELPHINSTONE ROAD MUMBAI-400 013 REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED OFFICER/MANAGER. 6. PNB HOUSING FINANCE LIMITED PROPERTY BEARING NO.5 MATHRUSHREE ARCADE, 100FT RING ROAD, 1ST PHASE 2ND STAGE, BTM LAYOUT BANGALORE-560 076. ALSO AT 9TH FLOOR, ANTRIKSHBHAWAN, 22 KASTURBA GANDHI MARG NEW DELHI-110 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER AUTHORISED OFFICER 7. M/S. MANTRI DEVELOPERS PVT LTD., MANTRI HOUSE, NO.41 VITTAL MALYA ROAD BENGALURU-560001 REPRESENTED BY ITS, MANAGING DIRECTOR AUTHORISED OFFICER REGD. UNDER COMPANIES ACT 1956. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. ANUPARNA BORDOLOI, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2; M/S KING AND PATRIDGE ASSOCIATES FOR R3; SRI. PINAZ MEHTA, ADVOCATE FOR R5; SRI. FRANCIS XAVIER, ADVOCATE FOR R6; SMT. JAITRA. J. NAEAYON, ADVOCATE FOR R7) - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:37886 WP No. 24185 of 2022 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO RESTRAIN THE RESPONDENT NO.6 FROM TAKING ANY PRECIPITATIVE ACTION AGAINST THE PETITIONER AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 12.09.2025 seeking permission to withdraw the petition. 2. The said memo is placed on record. 3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE RL List No.: 1 Sl No.: 12