Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. 126 CWP-13059-2025. Date of Decision: 08.05.2025. Balraj and another ....Petitioners. VERSUS State of Haryana and others ....Respondents. ***
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA --- Present: Mr. Abhijeet Sharma, Advocate and Mr. Dhananjay Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana for respondents No.1, 5 and 6. Mr. Karan Gaba, Advocate and Mr. Vijiyesh Malhotra, Advocate for respondent No.2-Bank. **** ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are small farmers and had availed the Kisan Credit Card loan facility from respondent No.2-Bank. The petitioners had deposited the premium and the application form along with supporting documents including a copy of the details of ‘Meri Fasal Mera Byora’ record as per the requirement laid down by respondent No.2-Bank. The cotton crop sown by the petitioners was damaged and they were required to be compensated under the Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana, but nothing has been paid to them for the loss suffered by them. He submits that he is confining his prayer in this petition to a direction to the District Level Monitoring Committee to consider the grievance of the petitioners and address the same in a time bound manner. JITENDER 2025.05.08 17:15 I attest to the accuracy of this document PHHC
CWP-13059-2025 -2-
2. Issue notice to the respondents.
3. At the asking of the Court, Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1, 5 and 6. Mr. Karan Gaba, Advocate and Mr. Vijiyesh Malhotra, Advocate have put in appearance and accept notice on behalf of respondent No.2-Bank.
4. Learned State counsel, upon instructions from Mr. Rajiv Mishra, DDA (Stat), submits that the petitioners may submit a representation to respondent No.6 and the same shall be decided in accordance with law.
5. Heard.
6. In view of the limited prayer, the petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to make a representation to respondent No.6, who shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law within a period of two months from the date of its receipt.
(ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL) JUDGE (DEEPAK MANCHANDA)
JUDGE 08.05.2025 jitender Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes/ No Whether Reportable : Yes/ No JITENDER 2025.05.08 17:15 I attest to the accuracy of this document PHHC