SUMA SRINIVAS v. NARASIMHAN SINCE DEAD BY LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE
WP/1604/2024 · 2025-07-14
M Nagaprasanna
Original Suitbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 54304 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 54304 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25893 WP No. 1604 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO.1604 OF 2024 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
1.
SUMA SRINIVAS W/O.T.M.SRINIVAS AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS
2.
DEEPTHI SRINIVAS D/O.LATE T.M.SRINIVAS AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS
P-1 AND P-2 ARE R/AT NO.12, 1ST FLOOR 2ND CROSS, SRINIVASA COLONY MISSION ROAD BENGALURU-560 027
3.
PRISM LIGHTS PRIVATE DEALERS IN ELECTRIC LAMPS NO.64, RICHMOND ROAD BENGALURU-560 025 REP. BY ITS PARTNERS ARPITH BALIYA AND SUNITHA BALIYA NOT A REGISTERED COMPANY
4.
ARPITHA BALIYA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS PARTNER PRISM LIGHTS NO.64, RICHMOND ROAD BENGALURU-560 025
…PETITIONERS (BY SRI SRINIVAS A.R., ADVOCATE FOR P-1 & P-2;
SRI CHANDRAIAH, ADVOCATE FOR P-3 & P-4)
Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25893 WP No. 1604 of 2024
AND:
1. NARASIMHAN SINCE DEAD BY LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES
LAKSHMI W/O.ESWAR AGED ABOUT 82 YEARS
2. PARVATHI W/O.SHAMANNA AGED ABOUT 79 YEARS
3.
ANJANA DEVI W/O.RAJANNA AGED 76 YEARS
4. BHAVANI W/O.SOMASHEKAR AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS
ALL ARE R/AT NO.17 1ST CROSS, SRINIVASA COLONY K.H.ROAD, BENGALURU-560 027 …RESPONDENTS
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE
ORDER DATED 16.08.2023 PASSED ON IA FILED UNDER
ORDER XXII RULE 3 OF CPC AND THE ORDER DATED 25.11.2023 PASSED ON IA FILED UNDER ORDER 1 RULE 10(2) OF CPC IN COM.O.S.NO.1276/2022 BY LXXXVI ADDITIONAL COMMERCIAL COURT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, (CCH-87) AT BENGALURU.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25893 WP No. 1604 of 2024
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for petitioners submits that the petition is rendered infructuous, as the suit itself is
disposed by an order dated 11.03.2025.
2. In view of the submission, the petition is disposed as having become infructuous.
Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE
LB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 155