Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 54299 (ALL)

KHALIQ AHMAD v. STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

WRIC/14393/2025 · 2025-10-08

Kunal Ravi Singh, Mahesh Chandra Tripathi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 14393 of 2025 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J. HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J. 1. Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Ambrish Shukla, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 3. This writ petition has been filed praying inter alia for the following relief: "(i) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to decide the applications of the petitioner i.e. (Annexure no.8) moved before the authority concern within stipulated period or to pay the compensation the petitioner land in question in accordance present valuation of the land in question as per circle rate of the of area so that justice may be done. (ii) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent authorities to pay the compensation as per 64% allowed by this Hon'ble Court in other cases of the compensation so that the petitioner's right may be saved by this Hon'ble Court." 4. In pith and substance, the grievance of the petitioner is that adequate Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Hriday Narayan Pandey, Narendra Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Khaliq Ahmad .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) compensation has not been paid in respect of his holding. 5. Shri Ambrish Shukla, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents, has placed detailed instructions on record. A copy of the same has been handed over to the learned counsel for the petitioner. It is stated therein that adequate compensation has already been deposited before the competent court, and it is always open to the petitioner to receive the same in accordance with law. 6. Considering the factual position, we are not inclined to proceed further in the matter in view of the aforesaid instructions. In case the petitioner approaches the competent court in accordance with law, the compensation shall be released forthwith, if there is no other legal impediment. 7. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. October 9, 2025 NLY WRIC No. 14393 of 2025 2 (Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Digitally signed by :- NAND LAL YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad