CHILAMAKURU BHARATH KUMAR REDDY v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/34839/2025 · 2025-12-22
Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 54298 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 54298 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010672332025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 34839 OF 2025 Between:
1. CHILAMAKURU BHARATH KUMAR REDDY, S/o. C, Chandrasekar Reddy, Aged 49 years, Occ Agriculture and MPTC, R/o. D. No. 5/13, sivalayam street, Proddatur, Y.S.R. kadapa, Andhra Pradesh- 516360
2. Chilamakuru Venkata Subbareddy, S/o. Late Chinna Peddireddy, Aged 75 years, Occ Agriculture, R/o. 5/10, Chowduru, Chowdur, Y.S.R. Kadapa, A.P -
516360. 3. Chilamakuru Venkata Subbareddy, S/o. Chinna Bo Reddy, Aged 57 years, Occ Agriculture, R/o. 5/8-a, Chowduru, Proddatur P.0, Y.S.R. Kadapa, A.P -
516360. 4. Lakki Reddy Venkata Rami Reddy,, S/o. Late Lakki Reddy Subba Reddy, Aged 63 years, Occ Agriculture, R/o. 1/38, Bollavaram, Proddatur P.0, Y.S.R. Kadapa, A.P - 516360
5. Lakkireddy Sankar Reddy,, S/o. Late Lakkireddy Subbareddy, Aged 62 years, Occ Agriculture, R/o. 1/81, Chowduru, Proddatur P.0, Y.S.R. Kadapa, A.P - 516360
6. Dudekula Seetamma,, W/o. Dudekula Kamal Saheb, Aged 54 years, Occ Agriculture, R/o. 1/94-A, Chowdur, Patadarga Chowdur, Proddatur P.O Y.S.R. Kadapa, A.P-516360
7. Dudekula Mahammad Younas,, S/o. Dastagiri Aged 35 years, Occ Agriculture, R/o. D. No. 21/225, Teru Road, BSNL Office, Teru Road, Jammalamadugu, Y.S. R. Kadapa, Andhra Pradesh - 516434
8. D. Babu Hussain,, S/o. Kamal Sahed , Aged 55 years, Occ Agriculture, R/o. D. No. 70/108-18-31, Opp to Chowdeswari Temple, Kalluru post Kalluru, Kurnool Dt. A.P- 518003. 2
9. Puli Lakshmi Narasimha Reddy,, S/o. P. Lakshmi Reddy, Aged 82 years, Occ Agriculture, R/o. 3/52, Chowduru, Chowdur, Y.S.R. Kadapa, A.P -
516360. 10. Yaddula Sudhavathamma,, W/o. late Venkateswara reddy, Aged 67 years, Occ Agriculture, R/o. D. No. 4/123. Sankarapuram Proddutur, Y.S.R. Kadapa Dt. Andhra Pradesh- 516360. ...Petitioners AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Industries and Commerce Department, Secretariat Buildings Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. 2. The Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation, Rep. by its Vice chairman and Managing director APIIC Towers, Plot No.1 (9 to 11 floors), IT Park, Mangalagiri, Guntur District, AP - 522503. 3. The Zonal Manager, Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation, Industrial Estate, Kadapa, Andhra Pradesh. 4. The Revenue Divisional officer, Jammalamadugu, YSR Kadapa District, A.P.
5. The Mandal Revenue Officer, Proddatur, Y.S. R. Kadapa Dt.
A.P. ...Respondents Counsel for the Petitioners: V NITESH Counsel for the Respondents: SANTHI CHANDRA SC For APIIC Counsel for the Respondents:GP FOR INDUSTRIES COMMERCE
3
The Court made the following ORAL ORDER:
Heard Sri Karthik, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri V. Nitesh,
learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioners and Sri Anudeep Nalluri, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Ms. Satish Chandra, learned Standing Counsel for APIIC.
2. Sri Anudeep Nalluri, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Ms. Satish Chandra, learned Standing Counsel for APIIC has submitted the Written Instructions submitted to the Zonal Manager, APIIC Ltd., Kadapa, dated 22.12.2025. Copy of the Written Instruction is also furnished to the
learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioners. This Written Instruction is taken on record.
3. Relevant portion of the Written Instruction is usefully extracted hereunder:
“10. It is to submit that the Writ Petitioner filed the instant writ petition in respect of land in Sy.No.657, however, the APIIC got possession of the lands to an extent of Ac.10.54 cents situated in Sy.No.699/1 an extent of Ac.49.46 cents situated in Sy.No.699/3, totaling to an extent of Ac.60.00 cents. Hence, the subject lands claimed by the Petitioners in the Writ Petition are not related to APIIC land.”
4. The above extract as well as the prayer in the Writ Petition would both indicate that the Writ Petitioners are complaining of threat of dispossession of their lands which are situated in Sy.No.657. Whereas, the above extract of the Written Instruction would indicate that the APIIC has got possession of land of an extent of Ac.10.54 cents Sy.No.699/1 and an extent of Ac.49.46 cents in Sy.No.699/3 totaling an to extent Ac.60.00 cents. It is also stated that subject lands claimed by the Writ Petitioner in the Writ Petition are not related to the land belonging of APIIC.
5. Having so recorded, this Court is of the opinion that no further
consideration in this Writ Petition is necessary. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. However, liberty is given to the Writ Petitioners to seek survey
4
of the land and get their lands demarcated, if so advised. No Order as to Costs.
6. With these observations and directions, this Writ Petition stands
disposed of. No order as to costs.
7. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order.
______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 23.12.2025 JKS
5
55
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD
WRIT PETITION NO: 34839 OF 2025
23.12.2025
JKS