Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 54296 (KAR)

SAMAGRA ELECTRIC PVT LTD v. MANJUNATHA B V SINCE DEAD REP BY HIS LRS/WIFE

CRL.P/3368/2023 · 2025-08-05

J M Khazi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30334 CRL.P No. 3368 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 3368 OF 2023 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: 1. SAMAGRA ELECTRIC PVT LTD CIN NO.U31400KA2015PTC081452 REP BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, MR K.R GOPAL KRISHNA. 2. MR K.R. GOPAL KRISHNA MANAGING DIRECTOR/ SIGNATORY OF PETITIONER NO.1, 3. MRS. BANASHANKARI K V AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY/ DIRECTOR OF PETITIONER NO.1, HAVING ITS / THEIR REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.19/2D, J.C. INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, BIKASIPURA ROAD, BEHIND METRO BENGALURU-560062 RESIDENCE ADDRESS NO.297, IKSHWAKU, 8TH MAIN ROAD, 3RD CROSS, NEAR 8TH MILE, M.S. RAMAIAH ENCLAVE, NAGASANDRA, BENGALURU-560073 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SHIVAKUMAR D A, ADVOCATE-ABSENT) Digitally signed by REKHA R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30334 CRL.P No. 3368 of 2023 AND: MANJUNATHA B V SINCE DEAD REP BY HIS LR/WIFE SMT. KUMARI H, W/O LATE MANJUNATHA B.V. AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/AT NO.308 (OLD NO.82) 21ST B CROSS, 6TH BLOCK JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU-560082 …RESPONDENT (NIL) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING TO ALLOW THIS CRL.P BY QUASHING THE ORDER DATED 13.03.2023 IN C.C.NO.8117/2021 PASSED BY THE XXVI A.C.M.M AND COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, (SCCH-9) BENGALURU ON THE APPLICATION FILED UNDER SEC.143-A OF THE N.I ACT AT ANNEXURE-A. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI ORAL ORDER No representation for petitioners. 2. No representation for petitioners even in the afternoon session. 3. This matter is of the year 2023. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30334 CRL.P No. 3368 of 2023 4. Vide order dated 25.07.2025, as a last chance, a week's time was granted to comply with the office objections, failing which necessary orders would be passed for dismissal of the petition. 5. Despite the same, office objections are not complied with. It appears petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. 6. Hence, petition is dismissed for default. Sd/- (J.M.KHAZI) JUDGE RR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 15