IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 376 of 2023 Decided on: 16.07.2025 M/s Techman Energy Limited … Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 _____________________________________________________ For the petitioner : M/s Ajay Vaidya and Narvada, Advocates. For the respondents : Mr. Sumit Sharma, Deputy Advocate General for respondents- State. : Mr. Vivek Thakur, Advocate for respondents No. 2 and 3. : Mr. Dhananjay Sharma, Advocate for respondent No. 4. : Respondent No. 6 ex parte. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Learned Counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of this petition. The petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. At this stage, learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that withdrawal of this petition should not come in the way of the petitioner if he wants to invoke the jurisdiction of some other Fora with regard to the reliefs claimed by way of this writ petition. All that this Court can observe in this regard is that this is subject to all 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 just exceptions and rights of the respondents. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge July 16, 2025 (narender)