- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26085 W.P. No.27014/2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL WRIT PETITION NO.27014/2019 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SRI. BOLE GOWDA S/O LATE PATEL LIONGE GOWDA AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS R/AT. DALWAI KODI HALLI VILLAGE HALAGURU HOBLI, MALAVALLI TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT-571430. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. M. SHIVAPRAKASH, ADV., [ABSENT]) AND: 1. SRI. VENKATARAMANAPPA S/O LATE VENKATESHAPPA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS NO.220, DODDATHATHAGUNI VILLAGE AGARA POST, KENGERI HOBLI BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK-560060. 2. SRI. G.M. SHIVAKUMAR S/O LATE MAHADEVAIAH AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS NO.06, 8TH MAIN ROAD KUVEMPU NAGAR DODDAKALLASANDRA KANAKAPURA MAIN ROAD BANGALORE-560 062. …RESPONDENTS (R1 IS SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED V/O/DTD:07.07.2025 PETITION AGAINST R2 IS STANDS DISMISSED) Digitally signed by RUPA V Location: High Court of karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26085 W.P. No.27014/2019 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE ENTIRE RECORDS IN O.S.NO.1699/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE LVI ADDL. CITY CIVIL & SESSIONS JUDGE AT BANGALORE (CCH-57). ISSUE WRIT OF CERTIORARI AND QUASH THE QUASH THE ORDER DT.13.6.19 AT ANNEXURE-F IN O.S.NO.1699/2016 ON TH FILE OF THE LVI ADDL. CITY CIVIL & SESSIONS JUDGE AT BANGALORE (CCH-57) CONSEQUENTLY TO ALLOW I.A.NO.9 & 10, PERMITTING THE PETITIONER TO CROSS EXAMINE PW1 AND TO ASSIST THE HON'BLE COURT FOR EXPEDITIOUS DISPOSAL & ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL ORAL ORDER This Court on 07.07.2025 has passed the following order: "This Court on 30.06.2025 recorded that on 23.06.2025 a week's time was granted to take out notice to unserved respondent No.2 by way of substituted service; no steps have been taken, finally a week's time was granted to do the needful. Today when the matter is called in the morning session as well as in the afternoon session, there is no representation for the petitioner. Hence, petition against respondent No.2 stands dismissed for non taking of steps. To show one indulgence, one week's time is granted to take steps in respect of deceased petitioner. List on 15.07.2025." - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26085 W.P. No.27014/2019 2. There is no representation for the petitioner when the matter is called in the morning session as well in the afternoon session and no steps have been taken. It appears that petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non prosecution. Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE BSR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8