Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 54260 (KAR)

SRI RAMAKRISHNA v. SRI KEMPALINGAIAH

RFA/1307/2022 · 2025-09-16

Anu Sivaraman, Rajesh Rai K

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:37066-DB RFA No. 1307 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1307 OF 2022 (DEC/INJ) BETWEEN: 1. SRI RAMAKRISHNA S/O LT NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS 2. RAVI S/O LT NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 52 YEAS BOTH ARE R/AT RAMAPURA VILALGE KASABA HOBLI KANAKAPURA TALUK RAMANAGARA DISTRICT - 562 117. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. HARSHA D JOSHI.,ADVOCATE (ABSENT) ) AND: 1. SRI KEMPALINGAIAH S/O PUJARI SIDDAIAH MAJOR Digitally signed by PANKAJA S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:37066-DB RFA No. 1307 of 2022 2. SRI VISHAKANTAIAH S/O LT KENCHEGOWDA MAJOR 3. SRI SHIVALINGAIAH S/O LT KENCHEGOWDA MAJOR 4. SRI SHIVANANAJAIAH S/O LT KENCHEGOWDA MAJOR 5. SRI KEMPANANJAIAH S/O LT KENCHEGOWDA MAJOR 6. SRI SRIKATNAIAH S/O LT KENCHEGOWDA MAJOR ALL THE RESPONDENTS NO.1 TO 6 ARE R/AT BASAVANA BANNIKUPPE VILLAGE KASABA BHOLI KANAKAPURA TALUK RAMANAGARA DISTRICT - 562 117. 7. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD(KIADB) NRUPATHUNGA ROAD BENGALURU - 560 001. …RESPONDENTS THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC ORDER DATED 01.07.2020 PASSED ON IA NO. III IN OS No.301/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KANAKAPURA, ALLOWING THE I.A.NO.III FILED UNDER ORDER 7 RULE 11(a) TO (d) OF CPC FOR REJECTION OF PLAINT. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:37066-DB RFA No. 1307 of 2022 CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K) There is no representation for the parties. 2. Till today, office objections are not complied with. Therefore, in view of the peremptory order dated 05.09.2024 passed by this Court, no further order is required. 3. Accordingly, the appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution. SD/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE HKV List No.: 4 Sl No.: 4