AYAN TARIQ AND ANOTHER v. UNION TERRITORY OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR TH DGP AND OTHERS
CRM(M)/901/2021 · 2025-02-28
Rajnesh Oswal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5425 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5425 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU CRM(M) No. 901/2021 c/w CRM(M) No. 58/2022
Ayan Tariq and anr.
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Mehtab Gulzar, Adv.
vs
U.T. of J&K and ors. .…. Respondent(s)
Through: Ms. Arsha Sharma, Advocate, Mr. P. D. Singh, Dy.AG Mr. Umar Shakeel, Adv.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE
ORDER 28.02.2025
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the investigation in FIR impugned bearing No. 127/2021 stands closed.
2. As such, the petitioner does not want to proceed with the present petition.
3. In view of this, CRM(M) No. 901/2021 stands disposed of.
CRM(M) No. 58/2022
4. Scanned record of the charge sheet be called for from the trial court.
5. List on 04.04.2025.
(RAJNESH OSWAL)
JUDGE
Jammu: 28.02.2025 Suraj 81 Rakesh Kumar 2025.03.04 09:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document