- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25726 WP No. 32947 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE WRIT PETITION NO. 32947 OF 2024 (L-RES) BETWEEN: MYSURU CITY CORPORATON, VANI VILAS WATER WORKERS UNION, NO.1, 2ND FLOOR, PAI COMPLEX, CHANDRAGUPTA ROAD, MYSURU -570001, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT. …PETITIONER (BY SRI KUTTAPPA B D, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE COMMISSIONER, MYSURU CITY CORPORATION, MYSURU - 570010. 2. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, (EAST AND WEST), VANIVILAS WATER SUPPLY, YADAVAGIRI, MYSURU-20. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT GEETHADEVI M P, ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 02/05/2024 OF THE PETITIONER PRODUCED AS ANN-B. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: Digitally signed by BELUR RANGADHAMA NANDINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25726 WP No. 32947 of 2024 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE ORAL ORDER Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. 2. This Writ Petition is filed seeking Writ of Mandamus. The petitioner which claims to be the Union of Mysuru City Corporation submitted a representation to respondent No.1- Commissioner of Mysuru City Corporation. The said representation is dated 02.05.2024 marked at Annexure-B. 3. The petitioner - Union in the said representation has raised a grievance that some of the employees working in respondent No.1-Corporation have furnished false records relating to their date of birth and educational qualification. It is the contention of the petitioner that the representation has to be considered in accordance with law. 4. There is nothing on record to show that the application is dealt with in accordance with law. This being the position, the Court directs respondent No.1-Corporation - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25726 WP No. 32947 of 2024 to consider the representation marked at Annexure-B in accordance with law within 4 weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order . 5. It is made clear that nothing is expressed on the merits of the claim made in the representation at Annexure- B. 6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. Sd/- (ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) JUDGE GVP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 103