APHC010139752019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] SATURDAY,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 512/2019 Between: 1.I.V V L SHIV KIRAN, S/O IMANDI CHANDRAMOULI, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, OCCUPATION PRIVATE SERVICE, PERMANENT RESIDENT OF KAKINADA. ...PETITIONER AND 1.STATE OF AP, REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT AMARAVATI FOR THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH 2.SMT IMANDI SATYA DEVI NANDAM SATYA DEVI, WIFE OF IMANDI VERRA VENKATA LAKSHMANA SHIVA KIRAN, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, OCCUPATION LECTURER, RESIDENT OF H.NO. 24/513, BUTTAIPET, MACHILIPATNAM,A. P 3.MASTER IMANDI RISHI VAIBHAV, SON OF IMANDI VERRA VENKATA LAKSHMANA SHIVA KIRAN, AGED ABOUT 7 YEARS, OCCUPATION LECTURER, RESIDENT OF H.NO. 24/513, BUTTAIPET, MACHILIPATNAM,A.P. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.AHMED EHTESHAM KAWKAB Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.SAI GANGADHAR CHAMARTY 2.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) 2 Crl.R.C.No.512 of 2019 The Court made the following: ORDER: The Criminal Revision Case has been filed under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for brevity ‘the Cr.P.C.,’) challenging the order dated 15.12.2017 in Crl.R.P.No.116 of 2016 in M.C.No.4 of 2014 on the of the Court of X Additional District and Special Sessions Judge for trial of SCs & STs (PoA) Act cases, Krishna at Machilipatnam. 2. No representation for the petitioners and respondent Nos.2 and 3. 3. Heard learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. 4. Revision is not maintainable inasmuch as the petitioner herein on an earlier occasion in Crl.R.P.No.116 of 2016 had invoked the remedy of revisional jurisdiction of the learned X Additional District and Special Sessions Judge for trial of SCs & STs (PoA) Act cases, Krishna at Machilipatnam against the orders passed in the revision. In view of the same, the revision is not maintainable under Section 397(3) of ‘the Cr.P.C’. 5. Hence, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as not maintainable. No order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dt: 20.12.2025 SAB / JLSR 3 Crl.R.C.No.512 of 2019 196 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE.No.512 of 2019 Date:20.12.2025 SAB / JLSR