IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AM (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 11459 OF 2025 o TO Between: Boya Narasamma, W/o Late Boya Narasappa, Aged about 45 years, R/o. D.No. 2-86, Marakattu, Aluru Mandal, Kurnool District. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Panchyat Raj and Rural Development Department. Velagapudi, Amaravathi. 2. The District Collector, Kurnool, Kurnool District. 3. The District Pancyat Officer, Kurnool, Kurnool District. 4. The Superintedent of Police, Kurnool, Kurnool District. 5. The Mandal Parshid Development Officer, Aluru Mandal, Kurnool District. 6. The Station House Officer, Aluru Police Station, Aluru, Kurnool District. 7. The Tahsildar, Aluru Mandal, Kurnool District. 8. Marakattu Grama Panchayat, Marakattu Village, Aluru Mandal, Kurnool District, rep. by its Secretary. secretariat Buildings. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of tfie Constitution of India is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in not considering the petitioner representation dated 07.04.2025 seeking not to evict the petitioner from the bunk located in Sy.No. 87, Marakattu Gramakantam, Alum Mandal, Kurnool District (besides Yellamma Avva Temple) without following the procedure though residential house possession certificate is in existing as illegal, improper, unjust, arbitrary, violative of Principles of Natural Justice lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 15TCPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to directing the respondents not to evict the petitioner from the bunk located in Sy.No.87, Marakttu Gramakantam, Aluru Mandal, Kurnool District (besides Yellamma Avva Temple) Counsel for the Petitioner :SRI. MAHADEVA KANTHRIGALA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: 1 APHC010218452025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] THURSDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 11459/2025 Between; 1.BOYA NARASAMMA. W/0 LATE BOYA NARASAPPA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 2-86, MARAKATTU, ALURU MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL PANCHYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS. VELAGAPUDI, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT, AMARAVATHI. 2.THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 3.THE DISTRICT PANCYAT OFFICER, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 4.THE SUPERINTEDENT OF POLICE, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 5.THE MANDAL PARSHID DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, ALURU MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 6.THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, ALURU POLICE STATION, ALURU, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 7.THE TAHSILDAR, ALURU MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. PANCHAYAT, marakattu village aluru mandal, kurnool district, rep. by its secretar? ...RESPONDENT(S); Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.MAHADEVA KANTHRIGALA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV 2.GP FOR HOME 3.GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER! Heard Sri Mahadeva Kanthrigala Petitioner, Sri T. Sanjeeva Rao, learned learned Counsel for the Writ Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, Sri Panku Rajesh Kumar, learned Assistant Panchayat Raj and Sri P.A.K Yadav, learned Government Pleader for Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri Sudhir Mattegunta, learned Standing Counsel for Gram Panchayat. 2. Learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner Court to the House Possession Certificate Mandal, Kurnool District (Ex.P.5) Court to the Photograph (Ex.P.7). has drawn the attention of this issued by the Tahsildar of Aluru He has also drawn the attention of this 3. Learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner has a right to conduct business Possession Certificate (Ex.P.5). 4. Sri T. Sanjeeva Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader would submit that the land which is allotted to the Petitioner in terms of the House Possession Certificate (Ex.P.5) is different from the land which is now occupied by the Writ Petitioner, which is shown in photograph (Ex.P.7). would submit that the Petitioner on the subject land in view of the House 3 5. Sri T. Sanjeeva Rao, learned Assistant Government Revenue has drawn the attention Pleader for of this Court to the Representation submitted by the Writ Petitioner (Ex.P.3) dated 07.04.2025 and would submit that the Writ Petitioner has never made such a submission even in the Representation only because the Writ Petitioner knew that the subject land is granted by the Tahsildar not covered under the House Possession Certificate (Ex.P.5). 6. This Court has perused the Representation dated 07.04.2025 (Ex.P.3) There is no averment by the Writ Petitioner that she has a vested right to run the business basing on the House Possession Certificate granted by the Tahsildar (Ex.P.5). 7. On the face of it, it appears that the Writ Petitioner has Court with unclean hands by stating false information that the subject land is covered by the House Possession Certificate (Ex.P.5). After perusing the documents, since this Court has already noticed that the Writ approached this Petitioner has never claimed any right basing on the House Possession Certificate (Ex.P.5) to remain and continue her business in the subject land, this Court is of the view that it should not show any indulgence, inasmuch as the Writ Petitioner did not approach tfle Court with clean hands. 8. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed. No order interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. as to costs. 9. Sd/- SHAIK NIOHD. RAFI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTjpi^^ ICER To, 1. One CC to SRI. MAHADEVA KANTHRIGALA Advocate Two CCS to GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV ,High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] Two CCs to GP FOR HOME, High Court Of Andhra Three CD Cooie.*? [OPUC] 2. 3. Pradesh. [OUT] 4. V HIGH COURT DATED:01/05/2025 ORDER oTaSBBB WP.No. 11459 of 2025 f 13 OCT 2025 |V Current section ^ ^*?6SPATC>^' DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS