HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (M/S) No. 1154 of 2025 Meharban ….....Petitioner Versus District Magistrate, Haridwar and others .….Respondents Present:- Mr. Bilal Ahmed, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ganesh Kandpal, D.A.G. for the State/respondent nos. 1 to 3. Mr. A.K. Sharma, Advocate for the respondent no.4. Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral) It is the case of the petitioner that he is the owner of Chak No. 345, Gata No. 652/3 Total 03.06.11 hectare, Puktha land situated in Village Imarti, Pargana and Tehsil Roorkee, District Haridwar. The petitioner has given multiple applications for its demarcation to the respondent no.2/Sub Divisional Magistrate, Roorkee, District Haridwar, but till date, the demarcation has not been done. The copies of such applications are Annexure 3 to the petition. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent no.4 submits that the petitioner has already agreed to sale the land on 16.10.2023. Under the garb of demarcation, he wants to grab the land belonging to the respondent no.4 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has only agreed to sale the land, but he has yet not sold the land. Therefore, he wants to get the boundaries of his land determined. 2 5. Learned State counsel submits that if the petitioner gives such representation to the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Roorkee, it would be decided within eight weeks. 6. The Court takes on record the statement given by learned State counsel. 7. The writ petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to give a representation to the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Roorkee within two weeks for demarcation as per rules. If the application is filed as per rules, the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Roorkee shall take a decision on the representation of the petitioner within eight weeks thereafter. (Ravindra Maithani, J.) 11.08.2025 Jitendra