Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 54237 (CHH)

GORELAL v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/2259/2025 · 2025-05-04

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:20449 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2259 of 2025 1 - Gorelal S/o Devcharan Aged About 39 Years Caste Panika R/o Davna (Khalpara) Gram Panchayat Chanderpur Tahsil Bhaiyathan District - Surajpur (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Panchayat Rural Development Department Atal Nagar Nawa Raipur District - Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Collector District - Surajpur (C.G.) 3 - The Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Bhaiyathan District - Surajpur (C.G.) 4 - The Tahsildar Bhaiyathan District - Surajpur (C.G.) 5 - The Naib Tahsildar Bhatgaon Tahsil Bhaiyathan District - Surajpur (C.G.) 6 - Sarpanch Gram Panchayat Chanderpur Post Salka Adhina Tahsil Bhaiyathan District - Surajpur (C.G.) 7 - Secretary Gram Panchayat Visunpur Davna Tahsil Bhaiyathan District - Surajpur (C.G.) 8 - Samrath Ram S/o Vishwanath Panika Aged About 50 Years Posted At Kotwar Village Gram Panchayat Patiyadand Post And Tahsil Bhaiyathan District - Surajpur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Digitally signed by RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Date: 2025.05.12 19:50:45 +0530 2 (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Ram Vifal Ram Rajwade, Advocate For State/Respondent/s : Mr. Santosh Bharat, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 05/05/2025 1. Heard Mr. Ram Vifal Ram Rajwade, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. Santosh Bharat, learned Panel Lawyer for the State/respondent/s. 2. At the very outset learned counsel for the petition submits that there is alternative remedy available under the law and he may be allowed to withdraw this instant petitioner with a liberty to pursue his grievances availing the alternative remedy. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent-State has not opposed the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. Considering the said facts and circumstances of this case, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn, however, the liberty as prayed for is reserved in favour of the petitioner to seek alternative remedy available in accordance with law. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Ravi Mandavi