DR,J WP.No.32434 of 2025 APHC010617272025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 32434 OF 2025 Between: 1. GEETHA V REDDY, W/o. R. Venkataramana Reddy Aged about 60, years, Occ house wife, R/o. H.No.21, 34th main, I cross, BTM II stage. Bangalore - 560 068. 2. A.S. AnandaReddy,, S/o.late Somasekhara Reddy, Aged about 76 years, Occ Agriculture, R/o. Attikuppam Village, Ramakuppam Mandal, Chittoor District. ...Petitioners AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Building Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. The District Collector, Chittoor, Chittoor District. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kuppam, Chittoor District. 4. The Tahsildar, Ramalcuppam, Chittoor District. 5. E C Vikram, S/o E.C.Chandra mohan Reddy, Atthikuppam Village, Muddanapalli Post, Ramakuppam Mandal, Chittoor Dist. 6. E C Vivek, s/o E.C.Chandra mohan Reddy, Atthikuppam Vitlage, Muddanapalli Post Ramakuppam Mandal, Chittoor Dist. DR,J WP.No.32434 of 2025 ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents 2 to 5 for not taking any action on petitioners representation /claim petition date 12-08-2025 s illegal, arbitrary and vidlation of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents not to pay the compensation to the respondents No.5 and 6 fourth with and pass such Counsel for the Petitioners: HARINADH NIDAMANURI Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE DR,J WP.No.32434 of 2025 The Court made the following ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed declaring the action of the respondent Nos.2 to 5 for not taking action on the petitioner’s representation/ claim petition dated 12.08.2025 as illegal and arbitrary. 2. Learned counsel for petitioners has relied on the proceedings issued by the District Collector on 25.10.2025 wherein the collector has considered the objections under 11(1) as against the preliminary notification and disposed of the objections with regard to the Ramakuppam Mandal but strangely, the respondent authorities has not considered the objections of the claim filed by the petitioners on 12.08.2025. Hence, the present writ petition. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents has made submissions based on the instructions furnished by the Revenue Divisional Officer, Kuppam on 20.11.2025. In fact, as per the above said instructions, the Managing Director of Andhra Pradesh Airport Development Corporation Limited has submitted a requisition in Form-I as per LARR Act, 2013 for an extent of Ac.481.998 Cents on 10.08.2025. In fact, earlier, the writ petitioners filed objections with regard to the rights and title over the property but it is beyond the scope of the authorities to consider that objection at that relevant time as per the Act, 2013 and the said objection would be taken into consideration at the time of award enquiry as per the Act, 2013 DR,J WP.No.32434 of 2025 4. Considering the submissions, this writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents to consider the objections filed by the petitioners at the relevant point of time and take appropriate decision. 5. Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of. No costs. As a sequel, all pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. ________________ JUSTICE D RAMESH Date: 25.11.2025 Dvs DR,J WP.No.32434 of 2025 115 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 32434 OF 2025 Date: 25.11.2025 Dvs