In The High Court at Calcutta In the Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri 06.01.2025 CRM (DB) 707 of 2024 KAUSHIK sl no. 18 In Re: An application for bail under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S., 2023 (corresponding to Section 439 of the Cr. P.C.) in connection with Sessions Case No. 129 of 2023 arising out of CBI Case RC 220 No. 220 2011 E 008 dated 17.08.2011 under sections 489(B)/489(C)/120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and under Sections 104/110/135 of the Customs Act (corresponding to G.R. Case No. 1535 of 2022). And In the matter of: Sanjay Kumar & Anr. …… petitioner Mr. Prajnadeepta Roy Ms. Sohini Kundu …… for the petitioners Mr. Sudipto Kumar Mazumdar, Ld. DSGI Mr. Ajoy Kumar Singhania …… for the UOI It is submitted on behalf of the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) that they have been deliberately and mischievously not impleaded as a party-respondent, despite the investigation having been carried out by them. It is fairly admitted by the petitioners that the CBI ought to have been impleaded as a party-respondent. In view of the above, CRM (DB) 707 of 2024 stands dismissed. 2 Liberty is granted to the petitioner to file an appropriate application in accordance with law after impleading the CBI. (Ravi Krishan Kapur, J.) (Uday Kumar, J.)