1 2025:CGHC:61612 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 4183 of 2023 1 - H.L.Gandharva S/o Late Jhaduram Gandharva Aged About 70 Years Pesha Sevanivritt Sahayak Lekha Parikshak Evam Kararopan Adhikari Nivasi - Naya Mandi Ward No. 01 Takhatpur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Secretary, Panchayat Evam Samajseva Vibhag, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Commissioner Karyalay Aayukt, Panchayat Evam Samajseva Chhattisgarh, Mantralaya Naya Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Joint Director Panchayat Evan Samaj Seva Bilaspur Sambhag, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Deputy Director Panchayat And Samaj Seva Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 5 - Divisional Joint Director Kosh Lekha Evam Penshan Bilaspur Sambhag, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 6 - Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Kota, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) ABHIGYA SAXENA Digitally signed by ABHIGYA SAXENA 2 For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abdul Moin Khan, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sangharh Pandey, Government Advocate Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 17.12.2025 1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking for the following relief(s) :- 10.1. यह कᔿ, उ्䵈रव㔾 द♀गण कᔿद♀श㘿त कᔿय ज᰾ व㔾 कᔿ य श㘿 त श㘿 यतप्䵔 पर〿रश㘿्䵖 प-01 यሹ㦌तयत रあप स㡇 गणद♀ष आध✾ र पर य श㘿 स㡇व㔾 ई प&ण अव㔾स㡇र द♀त ह㥁य कᔿर ) त र*। 10.2 यह कᔿ उ्䵈रव㔾 द♀गण कᔿद♀श㘿त कᔿय ज᰾ व㔾 कᔿ व㔾 य श㘿 त प* परकᔿध✾ रण ्䵈 र*। 10.3 यह कᔿ उ्䵈रव㔾 द♀गण यह भⵀ कᔿद♀श㘿त कᔿय ज᰾ व㔾 कᔿ य श㘿 उस㡇. प* एव㔾0 इन⡍.े䜰*ट . स㡇ቘ墏&ण एर〿रयस㡇 र श㘿 े䜰य ቤ撋 ज᰾ अकᔿव㔾लम⹍ब भⵀगत र*। 10.4 यह कᔿ, अन⡍य अतष ज᰾ े䜰 य न⡍य य लय उश㘿त स㡇े䜰झᵇ उ्䵈रव㔾 द♀गण स㡇 य श㘿 द☿द♀लव㔾 य ज᰾ व㔾। 2. At the outset, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that this writ petition may be disposed of giving liberty to the petitioner to make a detailed representation before the respondents/competent authority raising all grounds as raised in this writ petition along with the copy of petition and in turn, respondents/competent authority may also be directed to consider 3 and decide the same at the earliest within any specific period as fixed by this Court. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits that he is having no objection to the limited prayer made by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. 4. On the basis of submission made by both the counsel for the parties, at this stage, without entering into the merits of the case, this writ petition is disposed of giving liberty to the petitioners to file a detailed representation raising all grounds as raised in this writ petition along with the copy of this petition before the respondent/competent authority within ‘15 days’ from the date of receipt of copy of this order and on submission of such representation the respondent/competent authority is directed to consider and decide the same within an outer limit of 45 days from the submission of such representation in accordance with the relevant rules, law, circulars and instructions applicable to the case of petitioner. 5. With the aforesaid observation, the present writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Saxena