Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 54218 (PAT)

Pavitra Singh v. The State of Bihar

CR. APP (SJ)/2377/2025 · 2025-08-13

Prabhat Kumar Singh

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.2377 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-578 Year-2024 Thana- RANIGANJ District- Araria ====================================================== 1 . Pavitra Singh S/o Lakhan Singh R/o Village- Kajra Tola, Ward No.10, Pachira, P.S.- Raniganj, District- Araria 2. Roshan Kumar Singh @ Raushan Kumar @ Raushan Singh S/o Pavitra Singh R/o Village- Kajra Tola, Ward No.10, Pachira, P.S.- Raniganj, District- Araria ... ... Appellant/s Versus 1 . The State of Bihar 2. Ramjee Mandal (S.I.) S/o Late Baaldeve Mandal R/o- Babupur, P.S.- Baakharpur, District- Bhagalpur ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Kundan Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Binay Krishna, Spl. PP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 13-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. This appeal has been filed for setting aside order dated 27.04.2023 passed in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 147, 148 , 149, 341 , 323 , 324, 307, 427, 353 , 435 , 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and sections 3(i) ( r ) ( s ) / 3 ( 2 ) (iii) (va) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Act, whereby the prayer for anticipatory bail of the appellant has been rejected. 3 . As per the prosecution case , informant namely Ramji Mandal (A .S. I ) alleged that on the alleged date and time of occurrence , he received secret information regarding illegal Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.2377 of 2025(2) dt.13-08-2025 2/2 sand mining which was going on near the village Pachira and accordingly, a raid was conducted by informant and other police personnel and when they reached the place of occurrence , then these appellants along with other co-accused persons named in the F.I.R. obstructed police officials in discharge of their official duty and abused them by caste name and also assaulted police party due to which they sustained injuries. 4. Considering the fact that these appellants along with other accused persons abused and assaulted police personnel and also hindered in discharging their official duty , I do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned order, accordingly this appeal is dismissed. Koushik/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T