APHC010121362023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH WEDNESDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 6165/2023 Between: 1. LAGUMSANI VENKAIAH, S/O. BUBBA NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, KASUMURU VILLAGE, VENKATACHALAM MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND PLANNING, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI GUNTUR DISTRICT 3. THE COMMISSIONER, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, NH -16, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. M, SP 4. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR PANCHAYAT WING, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 5. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PRI NELLORE DISTRICT. 6. THE DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, , PRI SUB IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 6165/2023 LAGUMSANI VENKAIAH, S/O. BUBBA NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, KASUMURU VILLAGE, VENKATACHALAM MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT - 524320 ...PETITIONER AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND PLANNING, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI UR DISTRICT THE COMMISSIONER, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA 16, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. M, SP THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR PANCHAYAT WING, SPSR NELLORE THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PRI DIVISION, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. THE DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, , PRI SUB IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3332] WEDNESDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI LAGUMSANI VENKAIAH, S/O. BUBBA NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, KASUMURU VILLAGE, VENKATACHALAM MANDAL, ...PETITIONER THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND PLANNING, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI THE COMMISSIONER, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA 16, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. M, SP THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR PANCHAYAT WING, SPSR NELLORE DIVISION, NELLORE, SPSR THE DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, , PRI SUB -DIVISION, NELLORE-II, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 7. THE KASUMURU GRAM PANCHAYAT, REP.BY ITS EXECUTIVE AUTHORITY- CUM- PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, KUSUMURU, VENKATACHALAM MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 8. THE SARPANCH, KASUMURU GRAM PANCHAYAT, VENKATACHALAM MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 9. UNION OF INDIA, REP BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, NEW DELHI. 10. THE DIRECTOR, MAHATMA GANDHI NATIONAL RURAL EMPLOYMENT GUARANTEE MGNREG SCHEME, MINISTRY OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, KRISHI BHAVAN, NEW DELHI. 11. THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, DISTRICT WATER MANAGEMENT AGENCY (DWMA) PROJECT, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 12. THE MANDAL PARISHAD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, (M.P.D.O) VENKATACHALAM MANDAL, VENKATACHALAM SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the Respondents in not releasing the NREGS and CGF funds under RURBAN programme amounting or Rs. 10,58,156/- to me with interest in pursuance of NREGS with convergence grant work under RURBAN programme, towards cost for the material supplied by me for the works Providing CC Road at Kasumuru Gram Panchayat, Venkatachalam Mandal with ID No's. 097073003003080047, 097073003003080039 as being illegal, arbitrary and violative of provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 and Unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents to release funds amounting Rs. 10,58,156/- to me with interest in pursuance of under MGNREGS with Convergence fund under RURBAN programme, towards cost for the material supplied by me for the works Providing CC Road at Kasumuni Gram Panchayat, Venkatachalam Mandal with ID No's. 097073003003080047, 097073003003080039 and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to release MGNREGS and CGF funds amounting Rs. 10,58,156/- to me with interest in pursuance of under MGNREGS with Convergence fund, towards cost for the material supplied by me for the works "Providing CC Road at Kasumuru Gram Panchayat, Venkatachalam Mandal" with ID No's. 097073003003080047, 097073003003080039 pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. BURLU CHANDRA SEKHAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. VENKATA REDDY GAJJALA SC FOR ZPP, MPP, AND GRAM PANCHAYAT 2. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING 3. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV The Court made the following: ORDER: Aggrieved by non-payment of bill amounts to the petitioner for works executed for providing internal CC road facilities for Street 9, 10, 11 & 12 Shafabhavi Vaddipalem Venkatkrishnapuram and Chintalapalam of Kasumuru Gram Panchayat, Venkatachalam Mandal, SPSR Nellore District, the present writ petition is filed. 2. Heard Ms.R.Durga Latha Sree, learned counsel representing Sri Burlu Chandra Sekhar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Smt Naga Chandrika, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that the authorities have paid the entitled amounts to the petitioner and there remains nothing for adjudication, accordingly, prayed to close the writ petition. 4. In reply, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is not responding to their calls and prayed to record the said submission of the respondents and close the writ petition. 5. Recording the submissions of both the learned counsel, the Writ Petition is closed. However, if the petitioner feels that the cause still survives, he can file appropriate application within a period of two (02) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 05th November, 2025 RKS