RAHUL KERKETTA AND ANR v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR
CRM(DB)/683/2024 · 2025-01-03
Ravi Krishan Kapur, Uday Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 54210 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 54210 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
03.01.2025
SK/ct 1
In the High Court at Calcutta Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri sl no. 58
CRM(DB)/683/2024
In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Malbazar Police Station Case No.552 of 2024 Dated 17.08.2024 under Section 6 of the POCSO Act
2012.
In Re : RAHUL KERKETTA AND ANR…… petitioner
Mr. Kollol Acharjee, Mr. Biswaroop Roy,
....for State.
None appears on behalf of the petitioner nor is any adjournment prayed for even in the second call. The matter has been repeatedly adjourned on 20 December, 2024 and 16 December, 2024 and 5 December, 2024. It is obvious that the petitioner is neither interested nor serious in proceeding with this application and is onlyseeking for an adjournment with ulterior intent to forum shop. In view of the repeated non-appearance of the petitioner, CRM(DB)/683/2024, stands dismissed for default. The State is represented.
(RAVI KRISHAN KAPUR, J.)
(UDAY KUMAR, J.)