Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5421 (CHH)

STATE OF CHHATTISGARH v. VIKAS TANDON

MCC/133/2025 · 2025-02-06

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:6714-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 133 of 2025 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Home, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - The Director Public Prosecution Directorate, Part Iii, 4th Floor, Indravati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - The Joint Director Public Prosecution Directorate, Part Iii, 4th Floor, Indravati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Applicant(s) versus 1 - Vikas Tandon S/o Shri Ganga Prasad Aged About 40 Years R/o Vyapara Vihar Road, Nagdoni Colony, Bilaspur, P.S. Civil Line Tehsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 2 - Digvijay Dayal S/o Late Shri D.R. Dayal Aged About 42 Years R/o Village Karhi, P.S. And Tahsil Mungeli, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh 3 - Mukti Prakash Ekka S/o Late Shri Simon Ekka Aged About 50 Years R/o Village Khadijhariya Ambatoli, Post Baranjor, Tahsil Kunkuri District Jashpur Chhattisgarh 4 - Smt. Shiksha Meshram (Befor Marrige Shiksha Lonhare) W/o Shri Sushil Kumar Meshram Aged About 35 Years R/o Cspgcl Colony, Basantpur, Post Basantpur, P.S. And Tahsil Raigarh, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh 5 - Parmehswar Singh Dhruv S/o Shri Sukhiram Dhruv Aged About 44 Years R/o Village Bodhapara, Post Kanteli, P.S. Lalpur, Tahsil Mungeli, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh MANPREET KAUR Digitally signed by MANPREET KAUR Date: 2025.02.07 10:41:21 +0530 2 6 - Satya Prakash Mahilane S/o Shri Hari Ram Mahilane Aged About 39 Years R/o Village Raigarh, Post Raigarh, Tahsil Raigarh, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh 7 - Yamuna Madile W/o Manesh Chandra Banjare Aged About 39 Years R/o Vidyanagar, Ward No. 02, P.S. And Tahsil Bemetara District Bemetara Chhattisgarh 8 - Shivshankar Banjare S/o Late Shri G.P. Banjare Aged About 47 Years R/o Adarsh Chowk, Raja Talab, P.S. Civil Line, Tahsil Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 9 - Tulsi Ram Bharti D/o Late Shri Pitambar Bharti Aged About 48 Years R/o Rajendra Nagar, Ward No. 21, Bahadurguda, Jagdalpur, P.S. And Tahsil Jagdalpur, District Bastar (Jagdalpur), Chhattisgarh 10 - Uttam Kumar Gore S/o Shri Bhupat Singh Ghore Aged About 42 Years R/o Village Jhalmala, Ward No. 10, P.S. And Tahsil Balod, District Balod Chhattisgarh 11 - Krishna Pratap Singh S/o Shri Sanman Singh Aged About 38 Years R/o Sheetla Ward No. 16, Shikaripara, P.S. And Tahsil Balod, District Balod Chhattisgarh 12 - Mahendra Singh Dahriya S/o Shri M.L. Dahriya Aged About 42 Years R/o Quarter No. 42, Sector 02, Vidyanagar, Amlidih, Tahsil Raipur, P.S. New Rajendra Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 13 - Albert Toppo S/o Biasiyus Toppo Aged About 47 Years R/o Village Surjula, Post - Kalakh, Tahsil Manora Jashpur, District Jashpur Chhattisgarh 14 - Rajneesh Kumar Tekam S/o Shri Chabbilal Tekam Aged About 44 Years R/o Village Haarampara, Geedam, Tahsil Geedam, District South Bastar, Dantewada Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Applicant(s) : Mr. S.S. Baghel, Dy. G.A. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge 3 Judgment on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 06.02.2025 1. Heard Mr. S.S. Baghel, learned Deputy Government Advocate for the applicants / State. 2. This Court, vide order dated 16.04.2024, disposed of the WPS No. 3600/2020 (Vikas Tandon and others vs. State of Chhattisgarh and Others), as well as bunch of petitions directing the State Government to rework / re-frame the subject Promotion Rules and to notify the same within period of three months from the date of receiving a copy of the order. 3. Mr. S.S. Baghel, learned Deputy Government Advocate for the applicants / State states that despite making best efforts, as the entire exercise requires collection of empirical data and then re-frame the rules, collecting of data is a time taking task in the light of the fact that no census has taken place for the year 2021, as such, order dated 16.04.2024, passed in WPS No. 3600/2020 along with bunch of petitions by this Court, could not be complied within the prescribed time of three months granted to the applicants. Hence, this application for extension of time, praying for a further period of 3 months for reworking / re-framing the subject Promotion Rules. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the applicants and perused the documents appended in this application. 5. Perusal of the records goes to show that a sufficient period of 4 three months was already granted to the learned counsel for the applicants for reworking / re-framing the subject Promotion Rules while disposing of the WPS No. 3600/2020 along with a bunch of petitions vide order dated 16.04.2024. However, considering the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the applicants, it is directed that the applicants shall rework / re-frame the subject Promotion Rules within a period of one month from today. It is made clear that no more time shall be granted to the applicants / State Government for the said purpose. 6. In view of the above, the instant MCC is disposed of. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Manpreet