APHC010131172024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] SATURDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 6896/2024 Between: 1. JATIPATI ADILAKSHMI, W/O J.SRINIVASA RAO, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, OCC COOLIWORK, RESIDENT OF SATULURU VILLAGE, NADENDLA MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT OF A.P., VELAGAPTIDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PALNADU DISTRICT, AT NARASARAOPET. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NARASARAOPET POLICE SUB DIVISION, PALNADU DISTRICT. 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHILAKALURIPETA RURAL POLICE STATION, PALNADU DISTRICT. 5. SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, NADENDIA POLICE STATION, PALNADU DISTRICT. 6. G JATIPATI YEDUKONDALU, S/O LATE KOTAIAH, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, RESIDENT OF EAST BAZAR, SATHULU VILLAGE, NADENDIA MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT. 7. JATIPATI ANKA RAO, S/O JATIPATI YEDUKONDALU, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, RESIDENT OF EAST BAZAR, SATHULU VILLAGE, NADENDLA MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent Nos. 2 and 5 in not registering FIR against the respondents 6 and 7 on the report submitted by the petitioner dt 26.02.2024, 29.02.2024 and 07.03.2024 is illegal, unjust and violative of Art 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and against the provisions of section 154 Cr.P.C and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. T V SRI DEVI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 2. PENUMAKA VENKATA RAO 2 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been filed, by the Petitioner for the following relief: “ ... to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent Nos. 2 and 5 in not registering FIR against the respondents 6 and 7 on the report submitted by the petitioner dt 26.02.2024, 29.02.2024 and 07.03.2024 is illegal, unjust and violative of Art 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and against the provisions of section 154 Cr.P.C and pass ...” Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home representing for respondent State. Perused the material on record. Learned Assistant Government Pleader placed on record, the written instructions and would submit that petitioner is having family disputes with her husband, civil disputes are pending between them with regard to the properties, civil suites were also filed, Petitioner gave a spandana petition and respondent No.5 went to the disputed land and recorded the statements of respondents 6 and 7 and the matter is purely „civil in nature‟, and requested to dispose of the Writ Petition by passing appropriate orders. Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that recording the said submission, this Writ Petition may be disposed of. 3 In that view, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Petitioner is at liberty to work out the remedy before appropriate forum according to law. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* Dinesh 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 6896 of 2024 22.11.2025 Mjl /* Dinesh