APHC010069032023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 3444/2023 Between: 1. PASUPULETI SUMANTH, S/O SUBRAMANYAM AGED ABOUT 21YRS, OCC- BUSINESS R/O H.NO.29/215, VIVEKANANDA NAGAR NANDYAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, II TOWN POLICE STATION NANDYAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT 2. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, II TOWN POLICE STATION NANDYAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT 3. THE MANDAL EXECUTIVE MAGISTRATECUMTAHSILDAR, NANDYAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT 4. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NANDYAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT 5. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPT. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 6. SYED FEROZ HUSSAIN, S/O ALI AGED ABOUT 47YRS, OCC- BUSINESS R/O H.NO.12-5-188-1-2, SOUTH LALAGUDA VIJAYAPURI, SECUNDERABAD 7. DANDE SRINIVASULU, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER AGED ABOUT 45YRS, R/O GUDIPATIGADDA STREET NANDYAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondent Nos.1 to 3 in interfering with the civil dispute pending between the petitioner and respondent No.6 in respect of H.No.28/1042A, Saibaba Nagar, Nandyal, Nandyal District which is the suit schedule property in O.S.No.681/2022 on the file of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Nandyal without following due process of law as arbitrary, illegal and violation of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent Nos.1 to 3 not to interfere in the civil dispute pending between the petitioner and respondent No.6 in respect of H.No.28/ 1042A, Saibaba Nagar, Nandyal, Nandyal District which is the suit schedule property in O.S.No.681/2022 on the file of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Nandyal without following due process of law in the interest of justice. IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondent Nos.1 to 3 not to interfere in the civil dispute pending between the petitioner and respondent No.6 in respect of H.No.28/ 1042A, Saibaba Nagar, Nandyal, Nandyal District which is the suit schedule property in O.S.No.681/2022 on the file of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Nandyal without following due process of law pending disposal of the writ petition in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 3444 of 2023 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondent Nos.1 to 3 in interfering with the civil dispute pending between the petitioner and respondent No.6 in respect of H.No.28/1042A, Saibaba Nagar, Nandyal, Nandyal District which is the suit schedule property in O.S.No.681/2022 on the file of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Nandyal without following due process of law as arbitrary, illegal and violation of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent Nos.1 to 3 not to interfere in the civil dispute pending between the petitioner and respondent No.6 in respect of H.No.28/ 1042A, Saibaba Nagar, Nandyal, Nandyal District which is the suit schedule property in O.S.No.681/2022 on the file of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Nandyal without following due process of law in the interest of justice..…” 2. Heard Sri P. Nagendra Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V. Farook, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the police are interfering with the civil disputes in between the petitioner and the unofficial respondents. Learned counsel would further submit that a direction may be given to the police. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the police are not interfering in the civil disputes between petitioner and the unofficial respondents. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 6. Recording the above said submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the petitioner and the unofficial respondents. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 09.12.2025. TVN HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.3444 of 2023 Dated.09.12.2025 TVN 138