Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 54188 (AP)

Jayavarapu Surya Narayana v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/919/2021 · 2025-10-06

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010012192021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 919/2021 Between: 1. JAYAVARAPU SURYA NARAYANA, S/O SATYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, OCC. FARMER, R/O. PONUKUMADU VILLAGE, CHINTALAPUDI MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP, BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, GOVT OF AP AT AMARAVATHI. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, CHINTALAPUDI PS, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. JAYAVARAPU SURYA NARAYANA, S/O JAYAVARAPU LAKSHMI NARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, OCC. FARMER, R/ O. PRAGADAVARAM VILLAGE, CHINTALAPUDI MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDRA PRADESH. 5. JAYAVARAPU VENKATA SATYANARAYANA, S/O JAYAVARAPU SURYA NARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC. EMPLOYEE, R/O. DOOR NO. 4-190/5/108, WATER SIDE APARTMENTS, NIZAMPET, QUTBULLAPUR MANDAL, RANGA REDDY DISTRICT, TELANGANA. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. NIMMAGADDA REVATHI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. TURAGA SAI SURYA The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue an order, direction or writ, more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS directing the Respondent No.3 to conduct investigation and enquiry in accordance with the provisions of the criminal procedure and the police manual in FIR No.467/2020 Dt. 19/07/2020 of Chintalapudi PS, West Godavari District and pass .…” 2. Heard Smt. Nimmagadda Revathi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V. Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the respondent- police are not concluding the investigation and filing final report in Crime No.467 of 2020 dated 19.07.2020 on the file of SHO, Chintalapudi Police Station, West Godavari District for the offences punishable under Section 420 r/w 34 IPC. He would further submit that let there be a direction to the respondent police to conclude the investigation and file a report according to law. 3 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home of the respondents would submit that the Court may pass appropriate Orders. 5. Considering the submissions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed to conclude the investigation and file a report according to law as expeditiously as possible within a period of two (2) months from the date of receipt of copy of this Order, if not already filed by this date. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 07.10.2025. Vns