Research › Search › Judgment
Bombay High Court · body
2025 DAILYLAW 54187 (BOM)
PRAMOD S/O RAMBALAK YADAO AND ANOTHER v. THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD., THR. ITS MANAGER, WARDHA AND ANOTHER
CAF/45/2020 · 2025-01-14
Shri Sandipkumar Chandrabhan More
Civil Appealbody2025
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 54187 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 54187 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 1.caf.45.2020 IN THE HI
GH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 45 OF 2020 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 18372 OF 2019 Pramod s/o Rambalak Yadao and anr. ..vs.. The New India Assurance Co. Ltd., thr. Its Manager and anr. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri S.W. Sambre, Advocate for the appellants.
CORAM: SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.
DATE : 14/01/2025. The learned Counsel for respondent no.1/Insurance Company despite appearance remained absent, whereas respondent no.2 despite service failed to appear before this Court.
2. Heard
learned
Counsel
for
the appellants/Claimants.
3. The application is for condonation of delay of 116 days in filing the appeal against the Judgment dated 13.03.2019 passed in Application bearing E.C.A. No.04/2017.
4. There is no oppose to the application and therefore, considering the reasons stated in the application and in the interest of justice, the application stands allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).
5. The application is disposed of.
6. The appeal be registered on removal of all the office objections, if any.
(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE
, J. ) Trupti