APHC010576412025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 29992/2025 Between: 1. VYYURU HEMA SIVA KISHORE, S/O VENKATESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/O VUYYURU, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH PIN - 521165 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, ANDHRA PRADESH, MANGALAGIRI. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KRISHNA DISTRICT, MACHILIPATNAM. 4. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GANNAVARAM SUB- DIVISION DIVISION KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, VUYYURU TOWN POLICE STATION, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ANDHRA PRADESH ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. ANJANEYA PRASAD CH.B.V.D Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... to issue an appropriate writ, order, or direction, particularly one in the nature of a WRIT OF MANDAMUS,declaring the action of Respondent No.5 in summoning the petitioner to the police station and threatening him regarding ongoing matrimonial disputes without following the procedure established by law as illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction, and a violation of the fundamental rights guaranteed under the Constitution of India and consequently, issue a direction to Respondents No. 2 to 4 to conduct a detailed inquiry into the illegal actions and settlement activities of Respondent No. 5 2 (Vuyyuru Town Police), including the alleged illegal detention, threats, and coercive conduct complained of by the petitioner, and to take appropriate departmental action based on the findings and to pass” 2. Heard Sri Anjaneya Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that there is a matrimonial dispute between the parties. It is further submitted that the police are insisting the petitioner to enter into compromise by paying an amount of ₹35 lakhs to the unofficial respondents. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that a case in Crime No. 470 of 2021 was registered against the petitioner based on the complaint lodged by his wife, and the investigation in the said case has been completed and a charge sheet has also been filed. It is further submitted that another case has been registered in Crime No. 136 of 2025. Learned Assistant Government Pleader would also submit that the police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the parties and have never insisted the petitioner for payment of any amount. 5. Recording the said submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed to follow due process of law regarding the crimes which are registered against the petitioner. There shall be no order as to costs. 3 As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:06.11.2025 Asr 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.29992 of 2025 Dt.06.11.2025 Asr